My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00245
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:47:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/19/1991
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />June ll, 1991 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. David walker, Director <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />Re: Owens Creek Reservoir Project <br /> <br />Mr. Walker: <br /> <br />There seems to be some question or confusion regarding the <br />parties currently involved in the review of the referenced project, <br />and in what they are requesting from the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board. It will be the intent of this letter to clarify the objectives <br />presently being pursued and the roll that each party plays in the <br />process. <br /> <br />By way of introduction, I am serving as coordinator of the <br />committee consisting of representation from Battlement Mesa water. <br />Conservancy District (holder of the conditional water storage decr~e) <br />West Divide Water Conservancy District, Ute Water Conservancy Distric <br />and, at least for the present, representation from the CWCB, Grand <br />Junction office. I would like to express, at this time, that the <br />committee is extremely appreciative of the technical and cooperative <br />contributions provided by Demmus Harvey and Roger Skiles and we would <br />hope that, with your permission, this relationship may continue. <br /> <br />Obviously, as holder of the decree, Battlement Mesa would like to <br />see the reservoir become a reality. However, they recognize that the <br />passage of time has resulted in changing needs and changing benefits, <br />thus, the invitation to both West Divide and Ute to join them in this <br />re-evaluation. West Divide's interests include the possibili ty of <br />transporting some of the water into the West Divide Creek basin and/or <br />enhancement of opportunities or justification for constructing <br />projects within the West Divide basin. Ute, as the purveyor of <br />domestic water for the largest population concentration in Western <br />Colorado, is interested in ~he project for the municipal reserves it <br />could provide. This is not intended to indicate the limits of <br />interest, but the beginning. All of these conservancy districts are <br />collectively interested in any water development project of the lower <br />reaches of the Colorado River system within the state which have <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.