Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Context of Growing Front Range Water Use: Ecology and Equity: <br /> <br />After a century of agricultural, mining, municipal and other diversions, river systems in <br />Colorado are stretched to the limit. Threatened and endangered species are found on <br />most of our river systems. Increased demand due to population growth is threatening to <br />be the straw that breaks the camel's back, depleting streams and imperiling fish, <br />man1lUals, birds and invertebrates. Ironically, the health of the state's waterways is a star <br />attraction for millions who have moved here and for the tourists who visit and pump <br />dollars into our economy. <br /> <br />As the state deliberates over water policy options to address the drought and long-term <br />need for water, it is essential that it take into account the impacts of its choices on the <br />ecological health of our rivers and streams. The water conservation and other efficiency <br />improvements that this paper discusses are typically more environmentally sound ways of <br />meeting our urban water needs when compared with conventional structural solutions <br />like new, large dams or new, large diversion facilities. <br /> <br />New large dams, wherever located, typically carry with them a very high cost, <br />controversy, delay, and serious adverse impacts on the environment. The ill-fated <br />proposal for Two Forks Dam, which cost water providers over $40,000,000 to plan and <br />propose before ultimately being vetoed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is <br />a clear example of the problems facing new dam proposals. <br /> <br />Moreover, in a drought, when existing dams are half.full, there is not much more water to <br />store without wreaking serious damage on the environment. In our view,it is hard at this <br />point to justify use of taxpayer revenues, directly or through extension of bonding <br />authority, on these facilities when there is so much potential to meet our needs with less <br />impact and cost through water use efficiency measures. <br /> <br />Some Front Range planners are looking to additional imports of water from the West <br />Slope to solve our water problems on the Front Range, perhaps financed by the general <br />taxpayer. However, Front Range residents need to know that water arising on the West <br />Slope is already applied to a wide array of beneficial uses. Today's drought makes it <br />hard for the West Slope to meet existing human and environmental needs not to mention <br />those that may develop in the future. <br /> <br />In our view there is something wrong with our system of water allocation if it permits <br />growing, wasteful use of water on the Front Range to claim even more water from <br />western slope watersheds. It is only fair for those of us living on the Front Range to <br />increase the efficiency with which we use existing water supplies before we use the <br />general Colorado taxpayer to finance taking even more water from the state's Western <br />Slope. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />i <br />~ <br />