My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00244
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:47:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/23/2002
Description
CF Section - Statewide Water Supply Investigation - Review Plan of Study
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.-" <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />WATER USE EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS: . <br />A SOLUTION TO COLORADO'S URBAN WATER SUPPLY PROBLEMS <br /> <br />LAND AND WATER FUND OF THE ROCKIESI <br /> <br />JULY 2002 <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />Colorado faces a serious drought and potentiallongcterm water shortages. The drought <br />affects everyone from farmers to city dwellers to the river ecosystems upon which we all <br />rely. In theory, there are two basic solutions to our water problems: (1) stretch existing <br />supplies by water conservation and other "non-structural" water use efficiency measures <br />and (2) develop additional "structural" supplies through more dams and additional trans- <br />mountain diversions. <br /> <br />This paper sUU1lUarizes why the state of Colorado and its urban water providers should <br />focus on the efficiency solution. Best-management conservation practices and creative, <br />"non-structural" supply-side options will maximize the use of existing water supplies and <br />should be pursued much more aggressively before launching what could be a fruitless, <br />expensive and environmentally damaging program to develop more structural supplies. <br /> <br />The Problem: <br /> <br />We have read and heard about it for weeks. Fast-growing localities are facing emergency <br />measures in this time of drought. Cities across the state have increased the price their <br />residents pay for water, greatly restricted outdoor water use, and hired special officers to <br />enforce these restrictions. Examples can be found all across the state. <br /> <br />The City of Lafayette recently enacted an emergency drought ordinance placing a <br />moratorium on new taps, restricting outdoor irrigation to one day each week, doubling <br />water rates for the low-use block, and tripling rates for the high-use block.2 The towns of <br />Parachute and Silt, in western Colorado, were some ofthe.first cities in the State to <br />impose restrictions on lawn watering. Violators in these towns face fines up to $1,000 <br />and misdemeanor charges that could earn water wasters up to a year injai1.3 The City of <br />Boulder has adopted mandatory water restrictions and hired six new security officers <br /> <br />I TIrrough its Smart Waler Projecl, the Land and Waler Fund is assessing urban water use efficiency in <br />Interior western states. This paper is based on this ongoing assessment. The paper was authored by Bruce <br />Driver, Executive Director, Land and Water Fund, and is based on writing and research by Bart Miller, <br />Land and Water Fund Water Program Director, and Eli Feldman, Smart Water Project researcher. <br />'City of Lafayette Ordinance number 12 Series 2002, Amendment to Chapter 120 Article III. <br />3 Denver Post (May 17, 2002) <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.