My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00223
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:47:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Description
ISF Section - Proposed Water Right Donation - Colorado Water Trust, Peabody #1 Ditch and Lund Enlargement, Boulder Creek and Blue River
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I" <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />., <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ t , <br /> <br />- J <br />May 26, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />The water budget is an accounting form of sorts, which takes the diversion, reduces it for <br />ditch l!lsses, and then applies the water to the crop. Of the amount applied to the crop, a <br />certain percentage is assumed to run offinunediately back to the river; the remainder enters <br />the soil profile and is either consumed by the crop or deep percolates back to the river. <br />Because of the close proximity to the stream and the topography of the area, most at the <br />return flow probably returned during the month of diversion. The historic depletion is the <br />amount of water that may be transferred in the future, and therefore provides the basis in <br />estimating the worth of the water right. If your water right is transferred in the future, the <br />historic location, timing and quantity of depletions will need to be maintainecHn order to <br />protect downstream water users. <br /> <br />Based upon conversations with you and the Water CoDmrlssioner, and based upon our <br />knowledge of similar irrigation systems, we've made the following assumptions for our <br />depletion analysis: 15 percent of the diversions were lost through ditch ~age which <br />ev~ percolated back to the stream, 50 percent of the water delivered to your ranch <br />ran over the ground and made its way bl\ck to the Blue River; the remainder of the water <br />delivered to your ranch percolated into the $oil and was either consumed by the crop or <br />. returned to the river as deep percolation. Table 2 provides a sununary of the preliminary <br />water budget analysis. Our analysis shows that average annual depletions have historically <br />been about 87.0 ac-ftJyr..' <br /> <br />In summll"Y. the water rights you currently own in the Peabody No.1 Ditch and its Lund <br />Enlargement total 8.5 cfs. Historically, these water rights have been attributed to about 852 <br />ac-ft/yr of diversions. The water rights have irrigated about 60 acres of pasture on the Slate <br />Creek Ranch; historic depletions averaged approximately 87.0 ac-ftJyr. Return flows have <br />accrued to the Blue River at a point about four miles below the confluence with Boulder <br />Creek. <br /> <br />We hope this provides you with the information you need. We will plan to forward copies <br />of this letter report on to the parties we've identified that have an interest in these water <br />rights. Please give us a call if you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters <br />further. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />BISHOP.BROGDEN ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Michael A. Sayler, P.E; <br />Senior Water Resources Engineer <br /> <br />MAS/jv <br />Enclosures <br />C9441.00 <br /> <br />I Bishop-Brogden Associate~ Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.