Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l8f. Colorado River Basin Issues - Interim Surplus and Shortage Criteria for Operation of <br />Colorado River Reservoirs - Status Report <br />Tape 4 Start/Stop: 4302 - 4574 <br />Action: This was an informational item; no action taken. <br /> <br />l8g. Colorado River Basin Issues - H.R. 3267 Sonny Bono Salton Sea Reclamation Act of <br />1998 - Status Report <br />Tape 4. Start/Stop: 0000 - 0000 <br />Action: This was an informational item; no presentation made and no action taken. <br /> <br />l8h. Colorado River Basin Issues - Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Program- <br />Status Report <br />Tape 4. Start/Stop: 0000 - 0000 <br />Action: This item was withdrawn from the agenda. <br /> <br />l8i. Colorado River Basin Issues - Animas - La Plata Project - Status Report <br />Tape 4. Start/Stop: 3900 - 4218 <br />Action: Janice Sheftel recused herself from this item. A motion was made by Patricia <br />Wells that the Board authorize Acting Director Peter Evans to send a letter to <br />our delegation and the Congress stating that the Board prefers that the final <br />version of the ALP project allows Colorado to ensure its share of 5.200 AF <br />of the 6.000 AF of future depletions is available for future use within the San <br />Juan System within Colorado. and that it is made available to the non-Indian <br />community. The motion was seconded by Bill Brown (7) and approved <br />unanimously (8-0). <br /> <br />l8j. Colorado River Basin Issues - IS-Mile Reach ESA Section 7 Consultation <br />Tape 4. Start/Stop: 0516 - 0862 <br />Action: This was an informational item; no action Biological Opinion was issued and <br />the January meeting to take any action. <br /> <br />l8k. Colorado River Basin Issues - Instream Flow Recommendations - IS-Mile Reach <br />and Yampa <br />Tape 4. Start/Stop: 0862 - 3660 <br />Action: A motion was made by Greg Walcher that the Board withdraw all 4 <br />applications (the base flow and recovery flow filings on the Yampa and <br />Colorado Rivers); that the Board immediately reiterate to the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service by letter the Board's strong commitment to protecting flows <br />for the endangered fish; and that the Board defer judgment on what kind of a <br />flow ought to be filed until it receives better information from the biological <br />opinion from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the role of base flows and <br /> <br />Minutes January 27-28,1999 <br />Page 12 <br />