Laserfiche WebLink
<br />March 9,2004 <br />Page20f6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />requirements of FLPMA which are not inconsistent with the Ditch Bill2, FLPMA repealed old <br />rights-of-way statutes, but did not terminate valid rights-of-way established under the old <br />statutes, <br /> <br />Over 100 water users within the San Juan National Forest applied for Ditch Bill easements, The <br />U. S, Forest Service (the "USFS") drafted a proposed easement (the "Proposed Easement") and a <br />proposed operations and maintenance plan ("O&M Plan") which impose conditions on the <br />exercise of the Ditch Bill easement. The San Juan National Forest was selected as the "guinea <br />pig" for issuance of the Proposed Easement and O&M Plan, The attomeys for the Southwestern <br />Water Conservation District obtained the help of attorneys throughout the state, under the <br />auspices of the Colorado Water Congress and responded to the USFS with lengthy comments on. <br />the Proposed Easement and O&M Plan, <br /> <br />The terms of the Proposed Easement include two terms not previously imposed on Ditch Bill <br />easement holders: a reservation of authority to re-initiate consultation under Section 7 of the <br />Endangered Species Act in the event a new species is listed or new critical habitat is designated, <br />and a requirement for review of the terms and conditions of the Easement at the end of each 30- <br />year period, with the incorporation of new terms in the Easement as conditions may warrant. <br />Additionally, the USFS has stated that some environmental analysis under the National <br />Environmental Policy Act is necessary in relation to the imposition of its proposed terms and <br />conditions, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />II. CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED EASEMENT AND O&M PLAN <br /> <br />Under FLPMA, the USFS is to impose conditions on all rights-of-way to protect the <br />environment, scenic and aesthetic values, fish and wildlife, public health and safety, and the <br />public interest ("Public Values,,)3 While reasonable regulations related to these purposes may <br />be upheld by a court, such regulations cannot render the Ditch Bill easement impermanent, <br />require fees, or require additional terms and conditions at the time of the transfer of an easement. <br />In addition, the USFS may have authority to impose terms and conditions, consistent with the <br />purposes of national forests, pursuant to the Organic Administration Act of 1897.4 <br /> <br />2. See 43 U,S,C, ' l76l(c)((3)(C) ("Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, all rights-of- <br />way issued pursuant to this subsection are subject to all conditions and requirements of this Act <br />[FLPMA],"), <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />See 43 U,S,C, ' 1765, <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />See, e,g" 16 U,S,C, ' 551 ("The Secretary of the Interior [Agriculture] ..' may make such <br />rules and regulations and establish such service as will insure the objects of such reservations, namely, to <br />regulate their occupancy and use and to preserve the forests thereon from destruction, ","), <br /> <br />. <br />