My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00198
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the oil shale industry does not look bright. <br />This is only a layman's opinion. <br /> <br />It may be, in order to get the Yellow <br />Jacket Project under way, we will have to <br />phase it. We certainly must allow sufficient <br />water reserves for the ultimate development of <br />oil shale, because r am confident that it <br />will occur. It may be that we will have to <br />plan as a first phase agricultural uses only, <br />and those needs exist today. Then we sh6uld <br />make plans as part of the project for sufficient <br />reservoir storage to accommodate what certain- <br />ly will be at some time in the future a major <br />development of the oil shale reserves. This <br />will require some revision of the project plan. <br /> <br />The Yellow Jacket District, which is the <br />district primarily concerned with this proj- <br />ect, will be the sponsoring and contractual <br />agency. It has submitted comments to us <br />which have been forwarded to the Board Which <br />concur generally in the plan of development <br />presented in the project report. We have <br />also just this week received comments from <br />the Colorado River Water Conservation Dis- <br />trict in which it also concurs in the plan <br />of development. Both of those agencies, how- <br />ever, express one serious reservation. That <br />reservation goes to a paragraph in the project <br />report which states: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'In order to minimize losses to big-game <br />hunting, estimated at $6,500 annually, l4,000 <br />acres of private land in the Oak Ridge area <br />located between the White River on the south <br />and the upper section of the potential Josephine <br />Basin Canal on the north would be acquired and <br />developed along with 2,800 acres of adjacent <br />public domain. The lands would be made avail- I <br />able to the Colorado Division of Game, Fish <br />and Parks for administration as big-game <br />range.' <br /> <br />The cost of obtaining l4,000 acres of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.