Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />'. <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />White River National Forest Management Plan Comments <br />Februarv 18, 2000 <br /> <br />BYPASS WATER FLOWS OR INSTREAM FLOW RIGHTS: <br />Page 1-5 under Goall.l0-Water Quantity: <br />"Provide instream flows that support the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity <br />of those federal purposes for NFS lands (i.e.. safe drinking water and swimming, <br />aquatic life and habitat. recreation and aesthetics. and the natural conveyance of <br />water and sediment) that depend on such flows. <br />Objective 1.10 - By the end of the plan period acquire instreamflow water <br />rights or establish instream flow protection measures in special-use authorizations <br />which protect 10% of all perennial streams." <br /> <br />Since 1973 the State of Colorado has had an exemplary state-administered program for the <br />protection of the natural environment through its instream flow program which presently includes <br />more than 1300 instream flow rights on more than 8000 miles of Colorado streams and rivers. Goal <br />1.10 (Pal!e 1-5) should be rewritten to indicate that the White River National Forest will work with <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board to "orovide instream flows wherever such flows are <br />determined to be beneficial and consistent with the ourooses of the forest. " <br /> <br />Objective 1.10 (page 1-5) is offensive in the extreme in its overt declaration to extort instream flows <br />through the USFS's special use authorization process. Objective 1.10 (oal!e 1-5) must be rewritten <br />to delete anv sUl!l!estion that historicallv diverted water will be taken from oublic or orivate entities <br />throul!h the Forest Service's soecial use. or anv other. oermittinl! orocess. (Also at 2-5, #9; 3-52; <br />and 3-63.) <br /> <br />Within the White River National Forest there are 31 reservoirs and more than 200 water diversions <br />with special use permits. These are public and private water-related facilities legally located on <br />National Forest land, many of which are coming up for permit renewal. Objective 1.10 puts each <br />of these private property interests at risk of federal taking. <br /> <br />The U.S. Forest Service in other Colorado forests has attempted to impose bypass flow permit <br />conditions and consequently require that urban and agricultural water users relinquish a portion of <br />their perfected water supply in order to provide water for the secondary purposes of the National <br />Forests. If successful, these attempts would have had the effect of reallocating water from senior <br />water' rights to federal purposes in a manner that is inconsistent with the adjudication and <br />administration of federal and non-federal water rights in Colorado and would have constituted an <br />illegal federal instream flow program within the State of Colorado. Such a federal water grab would <br />