My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00188
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/14/1962
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.).LLlJ, <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />"All right." <br /> <br />"\tIi th your permission, Mr. Chairman, I'd <br />like to reverse these next two items as the <br />first one requires some slides and the last <br />one doesn't." <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />"All right. Then let's go to the Arkansas <br />Valley municipal water problem." <br /> <br />"I'd particularly like to report here <br />that members of the staff of the Board met <br />with the municipal league district in the <br />lower end of the Arkansas Valley last month <br />to attempt to assist those municipalities and <br />the Southeastern Water Conservancy District in <br />working out the details that would be neces- <br />sary for a municipal water supply system in <br />the Arkansas Valley as it is connected with <br />the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. We hope to <br />continue to work with them. As you all know <br />from very recent newspaper publicity, the <br />water quality is very poor in the lower region <br />of the Arkansas Valley and we think that the <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas project is a good vehicle <br />for improving that quality and we are working <br />with them toward that end. <br /> <br />The next item that I would like to get <br />to is a matter that came up after the agenda <br />was sent out and there is a very short dis- <br />cussion here. It goes back to some work <br />which was started by the staff of the Board <br />some two or three years ago and which, because <br />of the press of other business and circum- <br />stances, we have not been able to follow. We <br />hope that if Larry gets back to the Board we <br />will be able to get back into this again. <br /> <br />Thi s deals wi th the phreatophyte problem, <br />generally in the state of Colorado and specifi- <br />cally in the Arkansas River Valley. Some two <br />or three years ago we instituted a survey of <br />the entire state to determine whether or not <br />there was a phreatophyte problem in the State <br />of Colorado. This was only, I don't know if <br />you could dignify it by calling it a <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.