My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00188
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/14/1962
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />up a certain portion of their purchased water <br />to take care of these losses which New 1'1exico <br />claimed they would sustain. Therefore the <br />figure, instead of 5~, comes down to the <br />figure that Jimmy Geissinger mentioned or <br />4.7, eight-tenths of a foot being left in the <br />Acequia Madre for carrying purposes, evapora- <br />tion, etc. <br /> <br />vJe are now down to the point where, at <br />the last meeting, it was decided that we <br />should proceed with the amendments that are <br />agreed to in principle and begin working on <br />it. Mr. Reynolds, the New Mexico Commissioner, <br />and myself worked on this a bit and arrived at <br />certain facts and figures. We came up with <br />some changes and then we called upon our legal <br />representatives, Mr. Geissinger for the state <br />of Colorado and for the Interstate stream Com- <br />mission, Mr. Irby from New Mexico. They have <br />prepared tile document, more or less in legal <br />fashion, and it has now been gone over by the <br />Legislative Reference Bureau and a bill pre- <br />pared and that bill is in the hands of the <br />Interstate stream Commission. Only a day or <br />so ago, I received word from Mr. Reynolds that <br />his commission had that under advisement; that <br />he saw no objections to it himself; and that <br />he didn't anticipate the Interstate Stream <br />Commission of New Mexico would find any but <br />if there were any, they would be minor and it <br />would merely be a matter of Changing a word <br />or two here or there, or a figure or two on <br />which we think we.are all correct now. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />This is the reason that we feel that this <br />matter has to be brought before this Board <br />and should receive the support of this Board <br />since it involves no particular principle of <br />water law in Colorado, it merely involves this <br />particular compact and these particular people <br />who now are not able to use their property <br />which they have bought, namely this water and <br />water right. To that end it is necessary that <br />we have this compact amended. <br /> <br />Thank you." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.