My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00158
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/12/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />This is the reason for the 50 percent. As a matter of fact, in the <br />bill that was considered by the last General Assembly, they had <br />appropriated to us $500,000 for flood plain studies. There is no way <br />we could have spent that this fiscal year, but that's how serious <br />they regard this problem. That bill did not pass. That was in the <br />land-use bill that was considered. I told the committees considering <br />this legislation that I would present the matter to the board for <br />the adoption of a definitive state policy. We would prefer to go to <br />the legislature with specific projects, rather than having lump sums <br />appropriated. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: What is the state engineer doing, if anything, in <br />this area? <br /> <br />Nr. Sparks: The state engineer is making some flood control studies. <br />Apparently, he contemplates setting up a flood warning system and a <br />computer study of flood plains. <br /> <br />I had a conference with the state engineer and Mr. Ten Eyck about a <br />week ago to review the programs of this board and the state engineer. <br />I pointed out that that was not the function of the state engineer's <br />office to make flood plain studies. We don't know of any way to <br />crank in some magic figures in a computer to come out with a study <br />of flood:hazard areas. The state engineer does have the responsibility <br />for checking dam safety. Flood studies as they relate to spillways <br />is the responsibility of the state engineer, but nothing further. <br />The flood control warning system is the responsibility of the National <br />Weather Bureau. We work with those people. As a matter of fact, <br />flood control warning is very difficult at the best because these <br />floods happen suddenly and there is no computer that we know of that <br />can predict when a flood will occur. As a matter of fact, nobody <br />has been able to predict the occurrence of a flood in an area such <br />as ours. We can predict water levels downstream after high rainfall <br />in the upper regions, but that is the best we can do. So I can't <br />tell you how far the state engineer intends to go in this field. I <br />don't know. <br /> <br />I~. Stapleton: What do you expect out of the board at this meeting? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: The adoption of a policy that we will request the legis- I <br />lature to fund the local cost of flood plain studies of not to exceed <br />50 percent from state funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Do you anticipate this will be on the short session? <br />Or are we talking about a year from now? <br /> <br />-28- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.