My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00146
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:39 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/30/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;~ 16 <br /> <br />some way that this can be solved. I have studied these <br />reports and get the same answer all the time. There is <br />plenty of water for Denver. I have never,talked to anyone I <br />from the Western Slope yet that does not think we can iron <br />out our differences. There must be some way that rational <br />answer can be derived from this problem. We are certainly rJ -_ <br />ready to seiye our problems along those lines. _ <br /> <br />"The Hill report is a good report, prepared very thoroughly <br />with all the assistance that will ever be available for any <br />report. If we can't get people together from the Western <br />Slope and Eastern Slope to solve this, we are never going <br />to solve it. The water problem effects everyone in the <br />State. The size of the problem is frightening to me when <br />I think of the action that we take may hinder progress in <br />this State for one hundred years. You gentlemen voted <br />eight to four in favor of the Hill Report. The four dissenting <br />votes' were from the Western Slope. The State of Colorado <br />if united, could probably gain more from the Federal <br />Government and other sources now than ever'- before <br />in history. How can you get people to sit down from <br />both sides and look the situation over and make a recommendation?" <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: "Thank you, Mr. Petry. One of the big things <br />in the future is the industrial development on the Western <br />Slope. That is the biggest thing that will happen to the <br />State of Colorado. It will bring millions of dollars to <br />the State. Certainly we can't let anything interfere with <br />that. This Board has to justify its ~xistence by arriving <br />at some conclusion. We can't just toss it out of the <br />window." <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts: "It seems to me that the draft of the suggested <br />letter that Mr. Breitenstein brought to us is probably quite <br />a disinterested draft. On this basis, we should get together. <br />It also comes from a source that this is about the most we can <br />ask -for. The request made on this Board is not particularly <br />onerous. That draft or letter merely asks of us three things, <br />as a supplement to the resolution that this Board adopted at <br />it last meeting in December." <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts suggested that Paragraphs ~ and 8 of the <br />Findings and Recommendations adopted by the Board at its <br />December 11th meeting be changed to read: <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.