Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conseroation Board <br /> <br />Department ot Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone' (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX, (303) 866-4474 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Colorado wategconservation Board <br /> <br />Rick Bro~latte River Coordinator, Interstate Streams Investigation <br />Randy Seaholm, Chief, Interstate Streams Investigation <br /> <br />Peter H. Evans <br />ewes Director <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Greg E. Walcher <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />September 15,2000 <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Agenda Item 6.d., September 25-26, 2000 Board Meeting. <br />Platte River Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement. <br /> <br />I. Introduction <br /> <br />In 1997 the Governors of the states of Colorado, Nebraska and Wyoming signed an agreement with <br />the Department of Interior to improve and/or study the habitat of four endangered species in the <br />Central Platte River in Nebraska. The proposed program has three components: water, land, and <br />monitoring and research. This memorandum will highlight the status of the negotiations and <br />summarize some of the key activities of several of the Cooperative Agreement (CA) Committees. <br /> <br />II. Status of Negotiations <br /> <br />Several significant events occurred over the last two months which has changed the complexion of <br />the CA process and negotiations of a long.term agreement. The Environmental Impact Statement <br />(EIS) team announced that they will not be able to complete their work by August/September. <br />More importantly the EIS team announced that the preliminary evaluation of 7 or 8 alternatives, <br />which include the proposed program developed by the states, currently does not meet the minimum <br />requirements of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), The primary concern was described as <br />continued degradation (narrowing and deepening) of the Platte River channel as a result of <br />insufficient sediment supply. <br /> <br />This situation raises significant questions regarding the future direction of the CA and proposed <br />program. Colorado is currently trying to shift the focus of the discussions back to what we believe <br />was the original agreement (land, water and monitoring and research). Colorado believes that any <br />potential negative impacts to the Platte channel can be addressed by monitoring and based on those <br />results options can be developed if necessary. It is too early to determine whether a mutually <br />acceptable solution is available and/or viable. <br /> <br />What is certain is that the schedule for the CA and negotiations of a proposed program will need a <br />moderate to long extension, We currently anticipate the need for at least a two years extension. It <br />is somewhat frustrating to think about extending and already protracted process. The CA <br />participants are considering developing a few specific interim work tasks/milestones that will focus <br />on obtaining tangible progress in addition to the negotiation and administrative processes. One <br />other positive note is that Colorado water users should be able to continue business as usual during <br />this time extension. <br />