Laserfiche WebLink
<br />39 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: Well, just to get it on the floor, <br /> <br />I'd like to go back to the motion which was made and <br /> <br />hasn't been withdrawn, which was a hundred sixty-two to <br /> <br />be matched by ASC and other monies. That would be the <br /> <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: Characterized for stage 1 of the <br /> <br />Highland Lake Ditch project, I think, would be the way to <br /> <br />clarify it. <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I second it. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Herb seconds that. Further discussion? <br /> <br />All in favor, aye. Opposed, no. <br /> <br />(Vote taken.) <br /> <br />MR. PASCOE: From this point, I think that reflects <br /> <br />a real problem of somebody going ahead with the project <br /> <br />and not having studied it. I would hope that anytime <br /> <br />that occurs in the future, that we try to make clear that <br /> <br />there has to be a staff review and specific recommendation <br /> <br />and all the other process. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: Let me share with the Board, when I <br /> <br />brought my original recommendation to Senator Anderson, <br /> <br />after he included this or had it included on the House <br /> <br />side, I suggested to him that it be withdrawn. <br /> <br />He persuaded me that there had been an honest case <br /> <br />of miscommunication in this particular example, but I left <br /> <br />him with the understanding that during the course of the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br />