Laserfiche WebLink
<br />30 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />something and wait and do something else? What kind of <br /> <br />project is it? <br /> <br />MR. IOANNIDES: You see, they have a plan that these <br /> <br />ditches are going to be built and repaired as the need <br /> <br />might be over the next three to five years. <br /> <br />And we have operated like that with federal agencies <br /> <br />in the past. The Trinchera project, which you authorized <br /> <br />three, four years ago, was handled exactly the same way <br /> <br />and then when the project was finished, then there was <br /> <br />some money left and it was turned back over to the gen- <br /> <br />eral fund because they didn't have any use for that. <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: Would it be possible for us to work <br /> <br />on a basis of when they have money from the Agricultural <br /> <br />Stabilization Service, that we would then -- we would <br /> <br />then agree to match it? <br /> <br />As it comes we match instead of going out with this <br /> <br />full figure and sitting on it. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: That would be possible and I guess the <br /> <br />way we can handle that, we in effect could reconsider <br /> <br />that project every year in terms of putting it back on <br /> <br />the priority list. <br />MR. JACKSON: I'd submit it would be a lot fairer. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />They can stage this project, I'm sure, in individual <br /> <br />portions if that's the way they're going to do it anyway <br /> <br />and I don't think it's necessarily fair. <br />