My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00140
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00140
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/7/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />27 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: That's correct, because the statute is <br /> <br />explicit. It requires contractual arrangements satis- <br /> <br />factory to the Board. There has to be a final contract <br /> <br />signed. If we don't sign that final contract, there's <br /> <br />no project and that's the sole discretion of the Board. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: So that would be point number one. <br /> <br />Point number two, I have a very clear understanding with <br /> <br />both committees on the Senate and House side and with <br /> <br />Senator Anderson personally with respect to this project <br /> <br />that the Board must approve ultimately that project, and <br /> <br />if we do not, we will not proceed. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: On that premises I'd move for approval. <br /> <br />MR. GORMLEY: Seconded. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Further discussion? <br /> <br />MR. GORMLEY: Could I ask a question? <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. GORMLEY: In these projects where you have a <br /> <br />million two, and this suggests that some other agency is <br /> <br />going to provide, I gather, another million two -- is that <br /> <br />the general outline? Is that correct? <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: Let me go back to the record, Pat.. <br /> <br />On the Rifle Water System the $300,000 is the complete <br /> <br />excess due to inflation so that would be 100 percent <br /> <br />Board participation. Same for Silt. <br /> <br />On Highland, yes, the recommendation there is 50 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.