Laserfiche WebLink
<br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />indicated that obviously we would need to do a feasibility <br /> <br /> <br />study and it would easily be December of 1980 before, in <br /> <br /> <br />the normal course of Board activities, we could deal with <br /> <br />that project. <br />We also indicated to them the obvious, and that was <br /> <br />the legislative process was occurring across the street <br /> <br />and anybody is obviously free to go talk to their <br /> <br />legislator. <br />They did that and left the impression with Senator <br />Anderson, who is their senator, that we were giving tacit <br />approval of the project; and I have talked to Senator <br />Anderson about this. <br /> <br />Under the circumstances of miscommunication, although <br /> <br />it was unfortunate. I do think it would be unfair to the <br /> <br />Highland Lake people to recommend other than for <br /> <br />authoriz at ion. <br /> <br />However, ,as you see, the Senator was amenable to <br /> <br />including language in that this project is conditional <br /> <br />to future approval of the Board. We don't have a <br /> <br />feasibility study at hand. <br /> <br />We don't even know the size and shape of this thing <br /> <br />yet, so we'd clearly have to come back and do it. By <br /> <br /> <br />virtue of the fact that we have excess funds the priority <br /> <br />is not of concem, so under those circumstances, I think <br /> <br />I would suggest to the Board that maybe you don't want <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />