My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00101
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/26/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Grand Canyon Protection Act - Adaptive Management Program Status Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Department's views the GCPA as amending the "Law of the River" and adding to the authorized . <br /> <br />purposes of Glen Canyon Dam and Reservoir. In response, the Department invited interested <br />parties to provide comments and revised the guidance document. The Workgroup (referred to by <br />the Department as the "AMWG," pronounced "am-wig") had several weeks to review and <br />discuss the revised draft prior to this meeting and acquiesced in its completion with the following <br />paragraph summarizing the resolution of our principle point of contention: <br /> <br />One area that has been a source of recent discussion has been the question of planned high <br />releases from Glen Canyon Dam for such purposes as "beach habitat building flows," The <br />Department expects the AMWG to work and provide its recommendations within the following <br />context. Since the GCP A is clear that it was not intended to modify the compacts or "the <br />provisions of the Colorado River Storage Projects Act of 1956 and the Colorado River Basin <br />Projects Act of 1968 that govern allocation, appropriation, development and exportation of the <br />waters of the Colorado River Basin" (GCPA, section 1802(b)), any operational changes under the <br />auspices of the GCP A are clearly subordinate to and must fit within the constraints of those <br />provisions, Historically, there have been differences of legal opinion over some related <br />issues, such as whether releases of water above power plant capacity, if made for authorized <br />purposes, can be considered as not constituting "spills" within the meaning of section 602(a) <br />of the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968, and more recently over whether the GCP A <br />"amends" the Law of the River by adding additional authorized purposes for the operation <br />of Glen Canyon Dam. These legal issues have not been finally resolved, but given the <br />limitations provided in the ROD, the Glen Canyon Dam Operating criteria, and the 1996 <br />agreement between the Department and the Basin States, it is hoped they need not be. <br />Clearly, Section 7 of the CRSPA, which directs the Secretary" to produce the greatest practicable <br />amount of power and energy that can be sold at finn power and energy rate" provided that the <br />primary purposes of compact deliveries and state compact allocation development are not . <br />precluded or impaired, remains in effect, even though the GCPA (section 1809) authorized, and <br />the EISIROD implemented, an incremental reduction in the value of the hydropower resource. <br />Under the conditions of those documents (the ROD, operating criteria and the 1996 agreement), <br />flows above power plant capacity would be conducted using reservoir releases required for dam <br />safety purposes, The Department is currently focussing on operational modifications at release <br />levels below 45,000 cfs, Modifications to the operating criteria involving flows above 45,000 cfs <br />would require additional NEPA compliance." (emphasis added) <br /> <br />With the completion of these two efforts (i.e., the Workgroup's vision statement and the <br />Department's guidance document), the Workgroup will turn its attention to the development of <br />strategic goals and revision of management objectives in the next six months while many aspects <br />of ongoing research and monitoring continue. The Workgroup gave conceptual approval to an <br />overall budget of $7.85 million but agreed to reserve judgement on the details until better <br /> <br />information concerning the agencies requests and information needs is available later this year. <br />The other aspect of this program that we will watch most carefully is the development of an <br /> <br />"experimental flow" protocol that will set up a series of reservoir release scenarios and serve as <br />the basis future research. <br /> <br />Randy Seaholm will continue representing Colorado in the technical workgroup and we <br />will coordinate future policy issues with you based upon discussion with other basin states' <br /> <br />representatives and program participants. If you would like copies to the vision statement or <br />guidance document (or any other program documents), please let us know" <br />Attachment <br />cc: Randy Seaholm . <br />Jennifer Gimbel <br />Carol Angel <br /> <br />L:/boardmemljuly99/13i GCPA AdaptiveMgmt StalRept 0799hh <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.