My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~~~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />one inch of space. To take care of that <br />usurpation of space, obviously if we put in <br />another 10,000 feet and could go no higher <br />than the conservation pool limit, when the <br />conservation pool came up to that point and <br />we had a 10,000 foot permanent pool in there, <br />the permanent pool would be occupying 10,000 <br />feet which the conservation pool would other- <br />wise be occupying. So to take care of that <br />contingency; which has never occurred his- <br />torically, we have asked that the flood con- <br />trol pool, which is a pool of 278,000 acre- <br />feet, be invaded when necessary so that this <br />permanent pool could be raised up on top of <br />the conservation pool, so that no loss would <br />ever occur to the conservation pool. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We were asked I I think at the last <br />meeting, if we could increase the capacity <br />for recreation and fish purposes, why <br />couldn't we increase it for irrigation pur- <br />poses? I can only say that historically if <br />there had been another 100,000 feet of space <br />in there for the conservation pool, it could <br />never have been utilized because never in <br />the history of this reservoir has the con- <br />servation pool been completely utilized. <br />The closest it came was in 1958 when it <br />reached approximately 360,000 feet in capa- <br />city. Actually we would never need to in- <br />vade historically the flood pool either for <br />this permanent pool,with the exception of <br />1958 when it would have gone slightly over <br />the maximum elevation now permitted by the <br />Corps of Engineers. <br /> <br />There's no mystery about operating a <br />reservoir. We do it every day. The State <br />Engineer has that problem day in and day <br />out. . But in this case we have greater tools <br />with which to work than almost any reservoir <br />in the State of Colorado. That is because <br />the reservoir is controlled by an interstate <br />compact commission and by the Corps of Engi- <br />neers which has a resident engineer who lives <br />at the reservoir site. <br /> <br />There has also been some fear that <br />siltation in John ~~rtin Reservoir would <br />interfere or gradually fill up this 10,000 <br />acre-foot pool. Now again that's not true <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.