My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.L:7v~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We have gone throuqh a drought cycle <br />during the period 1950 to 1960 and this has <br />been an unusual occurrence so far as the <br />State of Colorado is concerned. We have gone <br />through two of those cycles in the past <br />sixty years. The first cycle occurring dur- <br />ing the period 1930 to 1940, the second <br />cycle occurring during the period from 1950 <br />to 1960. Those are abnormal periods in the <br />history of the southwestern United States. <br />So generally speaking, the historic storage <br />has been sufficient for any recreation or <br />fish and wildlife purposes; but obviously <br />when these periods occur the fish life is <br />destroyed. Then the 10,000 foot pool for a <br />temporary period, we think, would have ade- <br />quately preserved the recreation value of <br />John r~rtin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Again, we have had to balance off <br />economic factors; how much the Game and Fish <br />Commission, for instance, might want to pay <br />for this water; and in maintaining the pool, <br />the evaporation factor throughout this period. <br />The plan that we worked out was a hypotheti- <br />cal plan based upon the original purchase <br />of 10,000 acre~feet of water and sufficient <br />water annually thereafter to replace evapora- <br />tion so that no loss would occur to the <br />conservation pool. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />There has been some misapprehension, <br />perhaps, as to how you operate a reservoir <br />under those conditions. I say that we oper- <br />ate every reservoir in the State of Colorado <br />under the same conditions. That is, we have <br />stream flows comingled with reservoir stor- <br />age. That is a common situation which occurs <br />with every channel reservoir in this state! <br />We must measure the water in and measure the <br />water out, because the water that comes into <br />almost any reservoir may belong to a number <br />of different appropriators, either from <br />direct flow or from storage rights. But <br />essentially the way you would operate this <br />reservoir or any other reservoir to see that <br />no loss occurs to irrigators, is that first <br />there must be a gauge at the face of the dam <br />and a reservoir profile showing the capacity <br />in relation to the gauge height. That's <br />one method of determining the inflow and of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.