My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />in effect is the proposition that New Mexico <br />has proposed from the very start which we <br />have refused time after time, and now, in my <br />opinion, in a method of appeasement, in <br />order to accomplish the passage of their <br />'bills and perhaps get other development of <br />the state, we are now surrendering our water <br />rights. To go back to the study that was <br />headed by Mr. Riter, in the years '54, '55 <br />and '56, which are the shortest years of the <br />past 15, the burden falls upon the Animas. <br />During the rest of the time the Animas takes <br />some of it, the Navajo Reservoir passes a <br />larger quantity, yes; but in the short years <br />when a little water is very ~mportant, those <br />are the years that the burden falls on the <br />Animas River. ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We have no objection to subparagraph (b). <br />We think it is innocuous. Subparagraph (c), <br />the first part of it again we feel is innocu- <br />ous but the last clause in it we feel is <br />perhaps damaging, in that it can perhaps carry <br />an" inference that the laws of the state of <br />New Mexico will supersede the Compact', or any <br />other applicable"laws, as to the points of <br />delivery and place of use of the water. Under <br />the Compact, Colorado is required to deliver <br />to the state of New Mexico sufficient water <br />to allow New Mexico to make full use of the <br />water allocated to New Mexico.' It doesn't <br />say we have to deliver it in this river; it <br />doesn't say we have to deliver i t'in that <br />stream; it says we have to deliver it where <br />they can make use of it. Now if"-we deliver" <br />it to them ata point where they can make use <br />of it, even though they may not want to use <br />it, that's their tough luck. Our problem is <br />to deliver them the allocated water at a point <br />where they ~ make ~ of it. and we maintain <br />that we have the right to deliver that water <br />in the San Juan River as long as we fulfill <br />the requirements of the Compact. <br /> <br />, Now I have here a statement made by Mr. <br />S. E. Reynolds, the New Mexico state Engineer, <br />that was handed out to those attending and <br />present at the meeting, joint meeting, be- <br />tween delegates of both states in Denver on <br />March 14, 1960. His statement indicates that <br />the amount of water that we are talking about <br />can vary between 900 acre-feet per year - 900 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.