My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />still must release water from Navajo Reser- <br />voir, or the streamflows, to take care of <br />those downstream rights until such time as <br />their shortages equal the shortages for the <br />Animas River. <br /> <br />We think this gives us protection that <br />perhaps, under the strict terms of the Com- <br />pact, would be open to debate. In other <br />words, this shortage sharing provision only <br />exists when they are not getting the water <br />to which they are legally entitled to under the <br />Compact. Frankly,. gentlemen, we are unable <br />to understand how we can go any further in <br />the state of Colorado. I don't know how you <br />can put things on a more equitable basis, and <br />I think it is a considerable advantage to the <br />State of Colorado, this provision that we have <br />in here. Most of the time the greatest short- <br />ages occur on the Animas River. In many years <br />when we are. short on the Animas, there is <br />sufficient water. in the San Juan. Even though <br />it is still below Compact requirements, they <br />have to release it until their users from the <br />main stem of the San Juan equal our shortages <br />on the Animas. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />This view is not shared, apparently, by <br />the Southwestern Board; but it is our position <br />that this is the best agreement that can be <br />worked out, and, as near as we can determine, <br />gives Colorado more protection than an unknown <br />interpretation of the Compact would. <br /> <br />There has also been a fear that the <br />Navajo Indians, or any Indians, can call upon <br />stored water to satisfy those Indian rights. <br />I do not believe that is a fact. I'm sure <br />that ~tr. Moses, our Attorney, agrees with me <br />in that conclusion. We can never conceive of <br />an inst~nce where the Indians can call upon <br />stored water to which they would never have <br />been entitled under any theory so far advanced <br />by any federal agency. The Winters Doctrine <br />has not advanced such a theory. We can never <br />consider an instance in which Indians could <br />come ihto Colorado, for example, and say 'We're <br />low down here. We want part of the Animas <br />storage or part of the Jackson Gulch or Pine <br />River'. We think that's impossible. The peo- <br />ple under those projects have already entered <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.