My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. NELSON: <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />MR. GOSLIN: <br />MR. NEU30N: <br />MR. GOSLIN: <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br />MR. L. WILLIAMS: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"Are there any other statements?" <br /> <br />"I would say this. If the Board has any <br />objection, then I think the Attorney General, <br />and certainly I, would like to know about it <br />now before a great deal of time is devoted to <br />it." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"Mr. Goslin." <br /> <br />"If it's of any value to you at alI, I <br />think very definitely your Board should look <br />into this matter strictly from the standpoint <br />of the State of Colorado, Certainly our Com- <br />mission, and Mr. Moses is a member of the <br />legal committee of the Commission, is going <br />to look into it thoroughlY. But my advice to <br />you would be, from the standpoint of the State <br />of Colorado, you should have an independent <br />look at this problem." <br /> <br />"Thank you, Mr. Goslin." <br /> <br />"If there's .onlyone book in the Rocky <br />Mountains, how are we going to do this?" <br /> <br />"We will have some additional copies <br />shortly. The decision was released last <br />Saturday. All we passed around here was the <br />decree itself which ~rr. Goslin provided us <br />with. The findings, as has already been in- <br />dicated, are over 300 pages long. I will <br />say that we intend to scrutinize the matter <br />very carefully. I think, however I before the <br />State of Colorado attempts to get into the <br />suit at this point, there should be a very <br />compelling reason, and a reason that we don't <br />think anybody else can advance for us. We <br />have attempted to keep out of this suit be- <br />cause we thought we were not properly a party <br />to a dispute over the division of lower basin <br />water. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The only point in what has happened today, <br />the findings in the decree, is whether or not <br />there are findings here which could adversely <br />affect our interests. We don't think that <br />there legally can be. Nevertheless the de- <br />cision is a decision and it may have some far <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.