My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00100
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..I".v"%U <br /> <br />MR. MlLENSKI: <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. MlLENSKI: <br /> <br />"They just want to know the overall <br />plan - where the water is coming from and <br />how it's going to be operated." <br /> <br />"Mr. Sparks, do you have anything to <br />say as to what the Water Board engineer <br />down there is doing, or can do, or will do?" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Yes. We have made a number of sur- <br />veys down there. We have looked into <br />potential water sources. Now what Mr. <br />1~lenski has to say about the source of <br />water, of course, is exactly true. Re- <br />gardless of the source, however I the reser- <br />voir operation would be the same. You are <br />dealing with water, no matter what the <br />source is. The problem is to find that <br />amount of water initially, and sufficient <br />water thereafter to maintain the evapora- <br />tion. To do that, it would involve a court <br />procedure. You have to buy water rights <br />and go into court to get the point of use <br />changed to John Martin Reservoir. I am not <br />able to predict what the courts might do; <br />what stipulations or regulations they would <br />put in any decree or even if they would grant <br />such a decree. But in any event, whatever <br />water rights were purchased, only the con- <br />sumptive use portion of that water could be <br />credited to the permanent pool. In other <br />words, the flow which went back to the <br />stream historically could not be credited to <br />the permanent pool. <br /> <br />You run intb a major problem in trying <br />to acquire this water and then trying to de- <br />termine what the courts would do with it. <br />But the point that we are in, is that we <br />cannot acquire this water and go into court <br />until we have authority to put it in there. <br />But no matter what the source of water may <br />be, the operation, as far as the reservoir <br />may be concerned, would be the same. You <br />would simply, when the conservation pool <br />was empty I pass the inflow." <br /> <br />"But, Larry, if you acquire the water <br />high up and bring it by all the diversion <br />points of ditches (and I've seen the Arkan- <br />sas go where the Rocky Ford ditch has the <br />priority of 112 feet and they had 7) so it <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.