Laserfiche WebLink
<br />114 <br /> <br />The tellers reported their count of the yotes as follows: <br /> <br />Yes - 10 <br /> <br />No -- 2 <br /> <br />Blank -- 1 <br /> <br />The Chairman declared the, motion, favoring a contract <br />with Mr. Breitenstein for legal services, carried. <br /> <br />The Attorney General immediately announced, for the record, that in <br />spite of the Governor's position and in spite of the vote taken by the Board, he <br />would still make his own determination of the Board's need for special counsel, <br />and would not approve any contract until he had been satisfied personally as to <br />such need. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Continuing with Item l(d), regarding the contract for a consulting <br />engineer, the Director summarized the score of services rendered to the Board <br />and the state by R. J. Tipton'. He said Mr. Tipton, who has been consulting engi- <br />neer since the Board organized has in an outstanding degree seryed the Board as <br />its Consulting Engineer. Although on IBrt-time contract, he said Mr. Tipton has <br />always been available when needed. He said that Mr. Tipton fulfilled all require- <br />ments in this position because of his broad experience.and background; <br /> <br />Mr. Cross inquired if the Director'and Vice Chairman were conyinced <br />of a need for services of a consulting engineer. Being advised in the affirma- <br />tive, Mr. Cross made the fOllowing motion: <br /> <br />That the Colorado Water Conservation Board submit <br />to the Governor, and the .controller, a contract to <br />re-employ Mr. Tipton as consulting engineer for one <br />year, at a salary of $$,000, such contract to include <br />the 30-day clause for .termination of contract by either <br />party. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded by Mr. Pughe, and on vote was <br />declared carried. The Attorney General responded to <br />the vote by saying he was "Not Voting". <br /> <br />The Board took up Item l(f) regarding a bill for engineering con- <br />sulting services. The Director explained that this bill in an amount of. $400 was <br />one submitted by John C. Page, Denver, who had been engaged, after motion by the <br />Board, to review and make special study of a project report, and to make advisory <br />connnents. While 'so employed by the Board, Mr. Page was invited by West Slope in- <br />terests to speak at Grand Junction, and in that speech he made remarks which met <br />with criticism and objection by the \'fest Slope people. This reaction was so strong <br />that Governor Knous recommended holding up payment of the $400 bill, until the <br />Board had opportunity to review all the circumstances. Discussion showed that <br />Mr. Page had performed his assigned service to the Board, irrespectiye of his <br />appearance at Grand Junction, and the bill. was one that should be recognized. <br /> <br />Mr. Beaty moved that the bill of 'John C. Page for <br />$400 be allowed fol:' p<\yment. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Smith, and upon vote, was declared <br />carried. The Attorney General reported "Not Voting". <br /> <br />I <br />