Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 14 - <br /> <br />a. The reason for this is that THESE PROJECTS DO NOT <br />operate within the confines of a specific fund or <br />account. Their revenue is deposited into the <br />Reclamation Fund. <br />b. Nevertheless, these projects do have individual pay- <br />out schedules and revenue requirements which ore in <br />every aspect as demanding os those in the revolving <br />funds. <br />1. The onlY difference is that revenue from those <br />projects is available through the Reclamation <br />Fund to be appropriated for the general pur- <br />poses of the Reclamation program. <br /> <br />L'~ <br />,,":1 <br />;1 <br />.,:1 <br />',::1 <br />" <br />, 1 <br />~, ] <br />, ! <br />- j <br />". <t <br /> <br />; . <br /> <br />. ' <br />Future: <br />What does the future hold insofar as projected revenue <br />is concerned? On the Reclamation Fund, we now receive about <br />$165 million a year from PO\~er and \~ater sales and project <br />repayments. This will probablY not change significantly ex- <br />'. i <br /> <br />cept to reflect power rate increases. , <br />, . <br />a. There is one interesting projection, however, and <br />this involves the revenues received from the Mineral <br />Leas i ng Act. <br />1. In 1978, the total received was about $135 million. <br />The future on this activitv is most difficult to <br />predict because it is tied to the poliCY on the <br />use of Federal coal reserves aneJ to the revenue <br />which these reserves will t)ring in. <br /> <br />~'. . <br />-.... <br /> <br />~.:~ <br />"'.,',.,,-J <br />J;.-'..~ <br />n <br /> <br />-~ . { <br /> <br />...-...., ._._~ <br />