My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00054
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1998
Description
ISF Section - Acceptance of Injury with Mitigation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />development of Bear Creek and development 9f Bridal Veil. <br />Expansion of the existing Mill and Cornet Creek treatment plants <br />was not preferred due to limited physical water availability during <br />the late summer and winter period. Also, these alternatives would <br />cause additional direct depletion to the San Miguel River. <br />Similarly, the alternative of using high-capacity wells in the San <br />Miguel River alluvium would also directly deplete area streamflows. <br />In addition, the development of high-capacity wells, including the <br />use of the existing Town wells, was not favored due to water <br />quality concerns associated with historic mining activity. As <br />previously discussed, Bear Creek was found to be less attractive <br />due to high costs and impacts on the instream flows in Bear Creek <br />and in the San Miguel River below its confluence with Bear Creek. <br />In the end, development of Bridal Veil surfaced as the alternative <br />which provides the most protection to the instream flows. <br /> <br />Expansion of the Mill Creek treatment plant was carefully <br />evaluated because the treatment plant was specifically designed to <br />allow expansion of an additional O.S MGD (0.75 cfs) of treatment <br />capacity. However; the study recommended that the Mill Creek Plant <br />not be developed due to limited physical waeer supplies and water <br />quality constraints. During dry years Mill Creek stream flows at <br />the plant were projected to vary from 1.3 cfs to 1.5 cfs over the <br />period of December through March. This flow rate equals or is <br />slightly less than the plant's existing 1 MGD treatment capacity. <br />Consequently, the study concluded, the Mill Creek expansion would <br />not provide necessary water supplies during dry periods. <br /> <br />The study also conl:luded that the Mill Creek water supply <br />is limited due to water quality constraints. Treatment capacity is <br />frequently reduced during spring runoff and during summer <br />thunderstorms by high turbidity. During these periods the <br />treatment plant capacity is frequently reduced by as much as 2St to <br />50%. Finally, expansion of the Mill Creek plant would increase the <br />Town's reliance on direct stream diversions. Additional diversions <br />would be under the Town's senior municipal rights and therefore, <br />the expansion of the Mill Creek plant would have a direct impact on <br />the instream flow rights downstream of Mill Creek. ' <br /> <br />The Town's representatives discussed these studies_wi~h <br />SMVC representatives at the January 9 meeting. <br /> <br />The Town has carefully evaluated all feasible <br />alternatives to meet its future water supply needs and has found no <br />reasonable alternative that would be more protective of the <br />instream flows. The ability to use storage releases instead of <br />direct flow dive:;:-sions during periods of critically low flow <br />clearly ma~es the development of Bridal Veil the best alternative <br />for protection of the instream flows of the San Miguel River and <br />its tributaries. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.