My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00021
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:30:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/12/1965
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />HR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />NR. GOODt'1IN: <br /> <br />r'lR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />NR. SLIZESI<I: <br /> <br />~.J"'" <br /> <br />the eastern slope, but we still have some <br />flood dangers in this area. I think our <br />Congress - they seem to be a little happy <br />about giving Colorado River water to every- <br />body that wants it, but they are not too <br />happy about appropriating money to store some <br />of this water and let it down a little bit <br />slower - I think it's time that Colorado <br />really asked Congress for some help." <br /> <br />"Thank you, Craig. Do any other members <br />of our Board have comments? Do any members <br />of our audience have any comments they'd like <br />to make or questions they \'lould like to ask <br />the Corps of Engineers or Region 7? Hearing <br />none, then let's tall;: about this proposed <br />resolution. I would agree, craig, with you <br />that everybody in political office has a real <br />iron in the fire for reelection and I, for <br />one, am not going to let the heat got off for <br />a minute. I thiru;: it is good for the elected <br />officials, and it is certainly good for the <br />State of colorado, if we can keep it on. <br /> <br />First of all, Felix, I am wondering if, <br />in this resolution, $l50 million doesn't seem <br />right to me." <br /> <br />"Or to me either." <br /> <br />"I remember Colonel St. Clair, at a meet- <br />ing of the Missouri River Basin Inter-Agency <br />Committee, told me, two or three weeks ago, <br />that he thought the damage would exceed one- <br />half billion dollars. I don't want to <br />embellish anything, but I think $l50 million <br />is too low. Do we have anything to go on? I <br />know the Corps of Engineers said $l30 million <br />initially; I know they are raising it up; can <br />we get a little more accurate figure than <br />$l50 million? <br /> <br />Nr. Slizeski has a comment." <br /> <br />"Our current estimates for the South Platte <br />Basin presently are upward of $500 million in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.