My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00018
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:30:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/20/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />questions, because most of them are newly on board, I .doubt that we <br />will get any answers. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: I want to emphasize that these gentlemen coming here to- <br />morrow are merely carrying out a responsibility imposed upon them. I <br />don't think we have any real quarrel with them. They won't make any <br />decision. They didn't make this decision. They have an unpleasant duty <br />to perform. I suspect if they don't agree with the President they won't <br />be around long, but we will wait and see. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Does any member of the Board have anything? <br /> <br />MR. JAMES AUSTIN: I am Jim Austin from Montrose. We are concerned with <br />Dallas probably more than the Narrows, but it was our original assump- <br />tion .that we were coming down for the Dolores, Fruitland Mesa, and <br />Savery-Pot Hook. If we can assist any project by not looking at the <br />others, I think that would be the position of Montrose and probably Delta. <br />There is no reason to testify on something you don't know about, what is <br />happening to you, is there? <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: I don't think there is any intention that we are going to <br />talk about anything except the three projects that are scheduled. <br /> <br />MR. AUSTIN: <br />Reservoir. <br />a bunch of <br />know is to <br /> <br />I just heard Rolly talk about the Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />We might as well be talking about California. You will have <br />people here and our instructions to them are that the best we <br />stick on those three projects. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: That all depends on the hearing officer and his tight <br />reigns. It is not like this BOard where we set very strict limits and <br />if you don't talk it is your own fault. In fact, we haven't received <br />any ground rules. <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: The state will make an official recommendation to the <br />hearing tonight or tomorrow morning that these hearings focus only on <br />these three projects. We are not ready to discuss others and our posi- <br />tion will be very firm on that. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. CHARLES L. THOMSON: I share Mr. Austin's feeling on that and I <br />hope that you will be able to prevail on the hearing officer, Mr. Webb, <br />and the others to not dilute the time of the proponents of these three <br />projects and beyond that just within the last two days. Larry, I guess <br />you didn't get the word on Friday, that the majority leader of the <br />House, Jim Wright, requested permission from the Speaker of the House, <br />Tip O'Neil, on Wednesday to be the lead-off witness in the House on <br />Monday. Normally, the president of the Water Resources Congress has <br />always been the lead-off witness. I wanted to know who in the hell <br />bumped me out of that opportunity, but I will be glad to yield my time <br />to the majority leader of the House. He did request an hour at 10:00. <br /> <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.