My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00258
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:28:57 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Western Weather Consultants
Project Name
Vail & Beaver Creek
Date
11/1/1987
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />t <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />E.n <br /> <br />1/ <br />/o;rn-rM"\C.;TS .~.\1; CAL\'jt.;t, AS ?ELATEI. TO S~O'~' COYER <br />J:il':.r!' :-:. s......t'rlf-V _~I <.nc H. \.,'. Stt:in!j("ff <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />A 4-year study \Jas conducted in the San Juan Moun- <br />tai~ of south~estern Colorado to determlne t~-eTr€cts <br />of snow on the distribution and calvinf; of elk-tCer\;lis- <br />canadensis). Seventy-five a~rial st.:rveys resulted in <br />1262 \Jinter and 2325 spring elk sighting:::. l-!easllre- <br />ments of the snowpack were obtained in creas or ~1nter <br />elk slghtings and at 31 permanent snow stake sites to <br />~uantlfy the critical depth of snow for elk and to <br />estimate winter range. Gr0und surveys provided supple- <br />mental information to the spring flights for the eval- <br />uation of calving. The initiation and pattern of elk <br />migration were regulated by snov cover. Snov depths <br />approaching 40 cm (response depth) caused elk to move <br />to more exposed winter range, if such was',available. <br />Areas with more than 70 c~ (critial depth) snow cover <br />were avoided. South aspects and meadow cover types <br />vere used by elk more thao other habitat types during <br />the vinter period. Estimates of winter range indicated <br />that a 15 percent increase in snowpack may decrease <br />total winter range by 0 to 20 percent dependent upon <br />present snow conditions. Spring movement of elk back <br />into the high summering areas was associated more <br />strongly with the greening up of the open mountain <br />meadows than directly with a receding snow line. <br />Calving occured between mid-May and mid-J~ne at an <br />elevation of 2800 to 3200 meters. Each season there <br />appeared to be ample habitat available for calving <br />below the snow line. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Justification <br /> <br />Elk (Cervus canadensis) represent a valuable natural <br />resource. In 1968, hunte~s in Colorado spent over <br />$19 million on goods and services in connection ~ith <br />elk hunting (No be and Gilbert 1970). The tremendous <br />esthetic appeal of the wild wapiti further increases <br />the value of this big game species. With such a pub- <br />lic investment involved, any action ~hat night affect <br />the elk populations should be scrutinized carefully. <br /> <br />;:n !')t;!, Cens.......';'; rH"'''('J'"nr1 ..1-,(' 'lI'1rn"l', "f Pn("~"".;:'-~"""': <br />to conduct research on weather modification, thus <br />initiating "Project Skywater". \,,'ithin this nation- <br />wide weather modification research effort, the Colora- <br />do RIver BasIn Pilot P~oject was established to test <br />fully the operational status of winter cl0ud seeding. <br />The test site for this pilot project was a 8500 sq km <br />area of the San Juan Hountain Range of southwe~tern <br />Colorado. Much of the target area ~as abov~ 2900 m <br />elevation. Coope~ and Jolly (1969) cautioned that <br />"Although the snow management program contemplated <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation and other water sup- <br />ply agencies is initially to be directed mostly to- <br />ward high m?untain zoneS of deep snow not used by <br />big game during winter, spillover to lo~er eleva- <br />tion is not impossible. The effect Ol~ wildlife: <br />populations might be significant.' Perhaps more <br />important from the standpoint of the operating <br />agencies, the public may believe in such dn eff~ct <br />even if it does not exist. ~ildlife is a subj~ct <br />with such high emotional content that strong <br />efforts should be made to er.S\lre thdt anlr..al pop- <br />ulations are not adverse1y affect~d by l.'e,1th(:l" TI;od- <br />ification, and that the public is .'ll.'are of this." <br /> <br />.See +'D"'~ <br /> <br />C) "'. 1/<".& <br /> <br />Cci~CLUS IONS <br /> <br />THe following conclusions were drawn for the elk <br />population on Missionary Ridge: <br />Hypothesis 1 - Critical Snow Depth <br />1. The initiation of winter migration of elk is in <br />response to increaSing soo.... COver. <br />2. Snow depths approaching 40 cm (response depth) <br />cause elk to move to more exposed winter range <br />if such is available. ' <br />3. .Snow depths in excess of 70 cm usually prohibit <br />the use of an area by elk, and is considered <br />the critical depth ot snow tor elk. <br />Hypothesis 2 - Aspect Preterence <br />4. There may be a preferential use by elk of south <br />aspects and/or meadow cover types during the <br />I ~inter season. <br />" Hypothesis 3 - \.'inter Range <br />( 5. ~inter ran e'decreases ....ith increasing SnOw <br />cover, and may be decreased an average percenl <br />\ by cloud seeding (15 percent Increase 1n snow- <br />\ paCk). <br />Hypothesis 4 - Spring Migration <br />6. S rin mi ration of elk is associated wore <br />stron 1 with reening up 0 t e open wountain <br />meadows than directly w t t e rec~ ng snow <br />line. However, in late spr~ngs the recedIng <br />zone of partial snow cover may Ilm~t to some <br />degree the movement ot as much as iU percent ot <br />the elk herd. <br />Hypothesis ) - Llk Calving Location <br />7. The ma ority of elk calving occurs bet~een mid- <br />May and mid-June at e evat10ns ot iCUU co ~LU <br />8. The receding snow line in most cases does~not <br />I affect the location of calving. <br />iHypothesis 6 - Elk Calving ~ltes <br />9. Each s ring there appeared to be ample habitat <br />for calvin~ below t e zone 0 part a 6now cover. <br />10. Favor<<:~ ~l'yi?g~_si.te9 a~e characterized bv A m1x- <br />ture of timber cover and small-openings with <br />southerly exPosure. <br /> <br />1./ <br />3.1 <br /> <br />In Steinhoff, H.~., and <br />~ountains, Colorado. <br />Present Address: Dept. <br /> <br />.T,D. lves (Eds). 1976. Ecolcgical impacts of sno\o..pack aug!:',er.tati.on in the San Juan <br />San Jua.n Ecology Project, Finel Re.port. Colorado State Univ. Publ., Fort Ccl}.i:1s. <br />of Forestry, Univ~rsity of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, Arkansas 71655 <br /> <br />'15 <br /> <br />A-8d-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.