My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00258
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:28:57 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Western Weather Consultants
Project Name
Vail & Beaver Creek
Date
11/1/1987
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND OF CLOUD SEEDING FOR THE SAN JUAN ECOLOGY <br />PROJECT11 (W. Ho~ell. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) <br /> <br />When winter snowstorms sweep over the San.Juan Moun- <br />tains. not all of the moisture that condenses in the <br />form of clouds above the mountains falls as snow. <br />Much of it remains In particles too small to fall. <br />Carried beyond the mountains by the wind to where the <br />airflow sinks once more toward the plains, these par- <br />ticles re-evaporate. The rate at which snow reaches <br />the ground. expressed as a proportion of the rate at <br />which moisture condenses in the cloud, Is called the <br />efficiency of precipitation. <br /> <br />It has been found that in some storms. especially <br />those having relatively deep cloud systems with cloud- <br />top temperatures below about -27 C, the precipitation <br />efficiency tends to be relatively high, and in such <br />situations there is little that the current knowledge <br />of weathe~ modification could do to increase the. snow- <br />fall. In weak storms that condense very .little mois- <br />ture, there 1s likewise little potential for.'st'imu]a- <br />tion. HO\Jever.~" it has been found that when t~-'.--:;-- <br />clouds are-deep enough and active enough to conde~Q <br />r~latively large amounts of moisture but the ~lQu~ <br />top temperature is warmer than about -26 C. seedin2 <br />of the clouds with artificial ice nuclei often raises <br />the precipitation etticiency tram a rather low va~uc <br />to one typical of the colder clo~ Under these <br />particular conditions, cloud seed~ has the pote~- <br />tia1 of substantially increasin~ the rate.of precipi- <br />tation, probably by as much as a hundred percent. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />The Colorado River Basin Pilot Project was d~signed <br />as a statistical test of the capability of the cloud <br />seeding technology of 1971 to bring about precipita- <br />tion increases. When the weather forecasters expected <br />stormcloud conditions considered favorable for seeding <br />\Jithin a twenty-four hour period beginning at 11 A.M. <br />(and.if established safety criteria were met), an <br />"experimental day" was declared. A randomized deci- <br />sion then was made whether the experimental day would <br />be seeded or left" unseeded as a control. The experi- <br />ment was intended to run for four consecutive winters <br />and accumulate 160 experimental days about equally <br />divided between seeded and unseeded. It actually <br />ran for five winters and accumulated 71 seeded and 76 <br />unseeded days. <br /> <br />It was thought that the snowfall on seeded days mi~ht <br />"exceed~ that on unseeded experimental days b about 15 <br />percent an poss~ y up to 30 percent, and that.ex <br />perimental days mi~ht account for as much as half of <br />the season's snowfall. This would have corresponded <br />to a maximum precipitation increase of about 7,5 per- <br />cent for the season as a whole. Although evaluation <br />is not yet complete, Qreliminary results indicate <br />that no such sizable overall increase was realited. <br /> <br />There appear to have been many "unseeded" days ilTlt:le- <br />diately following seeded days when silver iodide <br />smoke, trapped in the valleys up\Jind of the mountain <br />range, affected the clouds and effectively caused <br />these days to be seeded, On other days strong winds <br />carried the seeding effect over the mountain 2rest <br />and outsid~.__:~s~r,.~rea. On still other days, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />designated as "seeded," the silver iodide failed for <br />one reason or another to reach the clouds. On still <br />other occasions the forecast of favorable conditions <br />was unfulfilled or else fulfilled for only a portion <br />of the 24-hour period. so that any seeding effect ~as <br />greatly diluted. <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />Nevertheless there exists an identifiable subset of <br />experimental days. free from these dlsturbinR influ- <br />ences. for which substantial snowfall increases <br />could be identitied with a hi~h deKree of confidence. <br /> <br />~he tentative conclusions from the project character- <br />ize it as a limited success. It revealed serious <br />weaknesses ot the lY/l technology in the methods used <br />to identify "seedable" occasions and to place the <br />seedin~ material in the desired place at the desired <br />~. It failed also to give a reasonabl~ accurate <br />meaSure of the potential of cloud seeding for in- <br />creasing the seasonal precipitation. On the other <br />. hand, it furnished additional evidence that the under- <br />lying principles are sound and that present weakness <br />has to do mainly with the practical difficulties of <br />effective application. <br /> <br />During the five winter seasons of the Pilot Project, <br />.32~ kg of silver iodide, containing 147 kg of silver, <br />were dispersed. An unknown proportion .of l't ~was 'de- <br />posited on the ground or .on vegetation near the gener- <br />ator sites; a further unknown proportion was carried <br />to One side or the other of the study area or deposited <br />\Jith precipitation either upwind or downwind from the <br />study area, or escaped precipitation processes and <br />remained suspended 1n the atmosphere. An estimate that <br />70 kg of silver actually accumulated within the 340,000 <br />hectares ofi the study area appears reasonable, an accu- <br />mulation of 0.04 grams per hectare season. The current <br />preliminary estimate of average snow accumulation in <br />the study area for the five years amounts to 65 cm <br />water-equivalent per season. If 25 percent of this <br />fell from seeded storms, this amounts to about 0.003 <br />gm of silver per hectare Fer centimeter of seeded pre- <br />cipitation. <br /> <br />During the five years. of the Colorado River 8asin Pilot <br />project, there was a midwinter dip in the frequency of <br />storms suitable for seeding, corresponding to mean <br />upper-air temperatures too cold for "seedability." The <br />exoeriments did not establish with a reasonable degree- <br />of confidence whether precipitation increases \Jould <br />appear as prolongation of snowfall durations or as 1n- <br />creases or intenSity, or both. Many such questions <br />can be answered only by further experimentation. <br /> <br />However. the results suggest strongly that the sn~fall <br />climate under seedinR will differ from the natural cli- <br />mate only in very subtle ways that can be distinguished, <br />if at all, only by sophisticated statistical analysis. <br />That seeded snowfall \Jill be in any way strange, either <br />as ~erceived or as it interacts \Jith the natural en- <br />viron~ent. is now considered extremely unlikely. <br /> <br />!/ The San Juan Ecology Project did not include studies vf the tecnniques.of cloud seeding. but to set the stage <br />for the remainder of this volume, we asked the Bureau of Reclamation to provide an overview of the c10~,1 <br />seeding activities, which they consider~tely provideo. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.