Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />LG,~'~i_~..-,- ~}'AC.l.~l !-~:~:,;?~CK A:':G:~,F..:,TA}'10l~ :S 7P.E SA.'; JlA.~ HOm;TAI~;S OF COLOkADQ <br /> <br />CP.APTER I INTRDDVCTIuN <br /> <br />h'€s, J. ~. S\.:~(:nE:Y. H. ....'. Steinhoff, and \"'. W. Ravell <br /> <br />This r.ocUl:Jcnt is the fin;;.l repC'rt of tb~ San Juan <br />Ecology Project (SJEP) ~h~ch ~as Deen supported by the <br />United States Bure~u of F.~21a~ation unGer Ccntract <br />No. 14-06-D-7052 fr')tr, 1970 to 1975. An earlier study. <br />that ~as prepared as a prohle~ analysis, has been re- <br />ported previously (S~EP. Phase I Final Report: Teller <br />et a1. 1970). Th~ pn-sl2nt report (Phase II) does not <br />include any of :he cdrly, preparatory material. <br /> <br />SUW.ARY Of fT:{ CO~~CLL'SID!iS <br /> <br />this Summar- condenses the evaluation of ecologic <br />impacts due to varvin~ sncvpack in t e San ueo Moun-- <br />tains. It is based on a study of the influence of a <br />snowfall ~hich is quite variable in both space and <br />time. Direct observation of the effects of sno~ack <br />au entation were not possibl~ during the 5-year lite <br />of the San Juan Ecology Project. but the relat ons ps <br />~stablished between ecosystem components and snow <br />conditions allow the estiL~tion of possible effects of" <br />long-term successful cloud seeding. <br /> <br />The statements which follow treat the main ecosystem <br />components in order. The impact of snowpack augmen- <br />tation on each ecosystem component Is arranged accord- <br />ing to the nature of the environmental change which <br />produced th~ effect. The basic environmental changes <br />are the ~ddition of more snow and more silver. Such <br />changes could initiate a chain" of effects that would <br />radiate throughout the ecosystem. The first links in <br />the cbain which have a significant impact on ecosystem <br />components are: (1) lo~er soil temperature in the <br />spring. (2) more moisture in the spring. (3) deeper <br />snoYp3ck. and (4) more silver. <br /> <br />This summary includes only statements verifiable from <br />the data. with causal connections and conclus~ons <br />that would be accepted by scientific peers 1n environ- <br />, mental disciplines. SpeculatIon about causal links in <br />the chain, or e~tension of implications beyond effects <br />~hich were studied in the chain, and where the extension <br />involves application of general ecologic understanding, <br />are avoided in this summary. Such appropriate 6cIen- <br />tific conjecture can be tound in Chap~ers II and III <br />and in segments of individual reports that are spec- <br />ulative by implication through the use of terms such <br />as "may be" or"probably", or Io.'hich are labelled as <br />"broad significance" or "implications." <br /> <br />Many other findings, ~hich are not directly related to <br />the effects of sno~~ack augmentation on the indicated <br />ecosystem components are a natural part of such studies. <br />For a surr~ary of these findings reference is made to <br />the abstracts of individual reports or to the details <br />of the individual reports themselves in Chapter IV. <br /> <br />Plants <br /> <br />..Only t...'o env~rG;)mt2r,l:..1 cnallj.;es l-..hich rdght be induced <br />by increased ~no~"fDl1 h,,\'e b(,'en found tc relate Signif- <br />icantly t.o p],l.!;tl; in the Sa71 JU:lll Nountains; ]o\.;er <br />soil te.mperatures bnd I.K're soil rnolsture. <br /> <br />- Lo~~r Soj] Temperatures <br /> <br />..3:niti03t:!on of shoot elongation .....as delayed fer pl.1nts <br />both 1n 'the tlmdrn ~nd forests [,5 a :-(;~aJl [ '_'f 10~'cr <br />soil tern eratllTeS a!;sorj.,;tE::d ....itl1 a deeper sno~'p;;cF for <br />.the species studied. Th~se jncJudea Eng e~ann spruce <br />(Pice.. enge-!'p~;. quaking <.lsp€-n (Po;->~ ~~), <br />Thurber f~$cu€ (I.:.Htu_~ _~rbf':..~j), nnd numerOllS <br /> <br />herbaceous species in both the tundra and forest t~a- <br />do~s. e delay was most apparent in s?eci€::s~ith <br />~~o~th points in the mme ate zone 0 Ower <br />temperatures at the ground level. This includes pri- <br />marily the herbaceous species. The gro~th regions of <br />trees, in the cambium and terminal buds. ~ere affected <br />more indirectly, possibly through soil temperature <br />effects on root function. From this a less clear re- <br />lationship between growth inception and snowpack vas <br />anticipated although there ~as a general correlation <br />of bud burst dates for both spruce and aspen vith the <br />SQOV clear dates. Moisture stress 1n spruce vas un- <br />usually hi~h durin~ the period of snowmelt and decreased <br />dramatically at about the snow clear date. This did <br />not affect the annual total radial growth of spruce. <br />which initiated 2 to 4 weeks earlier than bud burst. <br />apparently independent of snowpack. Resultant annual <br />biomass erowth of spruce was remarkably constant from <br />year to year, unrelated to snowfall. Aspen was more <br />variable in annual biomass production. Aspen growth <br />inception was delayed by a later snow clear d~te. but <br />we did not determine whether or Dot this was directly <br />linked to variations 1n biomass production. <br /> <br />.The eela, in be~inn~~ of ~rovth persisted throu~h <br />the other stages of the life cycle of most plants, <br />but With less magnitude. There seemed universally a <br />compensation tactor Which permitted every species <br />to co~plete its. annual cycle of development each <br />summer, regardless ot snowpack depth. t%cept tor <br />spruce. tnere was no s1mliar compensatory mechanism <br />for biomass production. In most herbaceous species <br />of the tundra. biomass production was inversely <br />related to depth of snowpack. <br /> <br />No effect was found on either initiation of development <br />or biomass production of oak (Quercus Kambellii). pre- <br />sumably because even in a deep snow year the snow had <br />always disappeared from oak plots before the earliest <br />date of growth 1nitiation. <br /> <br />- Non Moisture <br /> <br />Phytosociological studies in both forests and tundra <br />showed that plant communities were arranged along <br />snow clear date gradients. In the forests oak gives <br />~ay to aspen. then to subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), <br />and finally to Engle~nn spruce as the snow clear date <br />extends later into the year. The change was less <br />obvious in the drier communities. i.e~ in oak. The <br />tundra changed from xeric (drier) to more mesic or <br />even hydric co~unities. This could be expected to <br />result in an increase in frequency of the rarer species. <br /> <br />A dendrochronologic survey of ponderosa pine (~ <br />ponderosa) immediately outside the target arEa showed <br />its growth on dry sites to be associated with December <br />precipitation. The relationship is a direct one and <br />pine ~ould presumably sho~ an ir.crease in gro~th if <br />cloud seeding \Jere to add to mid-winter sno~.fall. !:o <br />'such relationship .....as found for Engelmann spruce, the <br />only other species on which dendrochronologic ~~rk <br />has been conducted in this study. <br /> <br />AniI:la]s <br /> <br />Only the 10~r soil temperature and greater sn0~ deyth. <br />~hich mi~ht be expected to follo~ an 1ncrease in snow- <br />fall, have been found influential on anirr~l activity. <br /> <br />! i <br />