Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />.IS <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />2S <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Now, from your knowledge of that project and your <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />conversations with Mr. Hjermstad and listening to his testi- <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I <br />mony today, do you have an opinion with regard to the possibl <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />ecological effects of the proposed project on the ecology of <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />the San Luis valley? <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />I sincerely and honestly believe that there would <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />1 be no effect of any consequence. Now, it's just that simple. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />Do you have an opinion with regard to this pro- <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />posed augmentation plan as to whether or not it would produce <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />any danger of significant harm to the ecology of the San Luis <br /> <br />Valley or the Rio Grande or the Conejos River drainage basins <br /> <br />in particular? <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I see no reason to believe that it would. I migh <br /> <br />add one other thing, too, if I might. May I, Mr. Maynes? <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />Yes. <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I have had considerable discussion with the -- <br /> <br />with Colorado University's group study in landslides; and, <br /> <br />in my discussions, it is -- they indicate to me that there <br /> <br />would be little or no harm from that particular aspect also. <br /> <br />Now, I think you plan to cover that more thoroughly later, <br /> <br />but I did want to mention it. <br /> <br />MR. MAYNES: That's all the questions I have, <br /> <br />Mr. Hearing Officer. <br /> <br />HEARING OFFICER LINN: Thank you. Are there <br /> <br />questions from the Advisory Committee? <br />