Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Very much so. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />Did you discuss them with Dr. Steinhoff? <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I have many times. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />MR. MAYNES: Mr. Hearing Officer, I would like <br /> <br />5 to have Applicant's Exhibit Number 2l admitted into the <br /> <br />6 evidence. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />HEARING OFFICER LINN: Admitted. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />(Applicant's Exhibit 21, previously <br />marked for identification, was <br />admitted in evidence.) <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Now, Dr. OWen, taking Applicant's Exhibit Number <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />11 21 if you would please, would you, for the benefit of the <br /> <br />12 Hearing Officer and for the Advisory Board, read some of the <br /> <br />13 conclusions that were reached as a result of thea::ological <br /> <br />14 team;'s studies over five years? <br /> <br />IS A We have this summary broken down into four groups <br /> <br />18 four topics: the producers, those are the plants, in other <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />words; and that is further subdivided~ But as I look down <br /> <br />here, we find under expected impact, short-term, five years <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />or less, low or none in all cases as far as the plants are <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />concerned. On long-term impact, in other words, greater <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />than five years <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />And it doesn't say it, but we were thinking in <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />terms of 5p to 100 years of continuous weather modification, <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />in other words, an operational situation, not just a pilot <br /> <br />2S <br /> <br />project. Again, I find that the highest impact would be <br /> <br />_lq_ <br />