Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />To my knowledge, there is not another project in <br /> <br />2 this area. <br /> <br />3 Q Do you know of any other project anywhere that <br /> <br />4 would be adversely affected by this project or vice versa? <br /> <br />S A I cannot think of any at the present time. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />Now, with your experience in the San Juan project, <br /> <br />1 do you know of any substantial harm to land, people, health, <br /> <br />8 safety, property, or the environment as a result of that <br /> <br />9 five-year pilot program? <br /> <br />10 A To my knowledge and from the preliminary reports <br /> <br />11 released by the group studying that specific concern, there <br /> <br />12 were no sUbstantial harms to'those items that you have indi- <br /> <br />13 cated. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />And in your judgment and opinion, does the pro- <br /> <br />IS ject which you propose to obtain a permit for have the like <br /> <br />16 or equivalent safeguards with the pilot project safeguards? <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br /> <br />2S <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />I feel that the safeguards that have been incorp- <br /> <br />orated into this program are even more restrictive than those <br /> <br />that were included in the Pilot project. <br /> <br />The Pilot project, for example, had a l50 per cent <br /> <br />of long-term, average,snowpack accumulation; and this project <br /> <br />here is proposing a l25 per cent of the short-term, which <br /> <br />generally is a smaller amount. So, from that standpoint, it <br /> <br />even becomes more restrictive than just 125 per cent of a <br /> <br />long-term restriction. <br /> <br />-27- <br />