Laserfiche WebLink
<br />275 m Williams Tower on the west side of <br />Houston_ A room on the 59tn Roor of that building <br />was used fO{ sampling during thiS campaign. A <br />ground~based version of the DMNTDMA system <br />operated on board the Cheyenne was used to <br />characterize submiaon aerosol sIZe distnbutJOns <br />and size-resolved hygroscopic growth. The size <br />distnbution of supermaon partides was <br />measured using a TSI. Inc. Model 3321 <br />Aerodynamic PartICle Sizer (APS). Direct <br />measurements of CCN concentration at a single <br />supersaturation were measured W11h the same <br />model DMT counter as that used on board the <br />Cheyenne Whereas the TOMA and CCN <br />counter were operated in parallel on the <br />Cheyenne to maximize time resolution. they were <br />intermittently operated in series at the surface <br />site to examine the relatIonship between particle <br />size. hygroscopic behavlOl". and activation <br />efficiency <br /> <br />The measurements dunng the HEAT campaign <br />can best be demonstrated by desCl1bing one of <br />the flights. A summary of the aerosol <br />measurements conducted on August 23. 2004 is <br />given in here. Traverses upwind (to the south of <br />the city) and downwind (on the north side of the <br />city) were made at doud base to document the <br />aerosols being ingested by the douds. This was <br />followed by in-doud measurements at <br />progressively higher elevations to document the <br />effect of the aerosols on the cloud properties. <br />The subdoud measurements for this flight are <br />provided in the figure. <br /> <br />The data suggests that Houston emissions may <br />have a significant impact on CCN concentrations <br />even when mass concentrallon measurements. <br />which are more sensitive to larger particles. are <br />largely unaffected <br /> <br />I-.., <br /> <br />I ::j' <br />F= <br />~- <br />-. <br />: " <br />., <br /> <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.'i- ;,,} <br />lOl~ ,.A-- <br />-~-. ~~f <br />JCo~ ; --...::. :-:..'7- <br />I J,::\ ~_~" , <br />1- ~r (-1~__~. i <br />In -.. -T' ~.._,~ <br />n. - -~-~\ ~ -~~. \ <br />",J. <br />'\ <br />1'-. <br /> <br />:106-1'-. <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />., <br /> <br /> <br />) '- <br />-~\--- - <br />--'>~ <br />:'1 <br />\ <br />I~ <br />.~I <br />.',?, <br />,~p/ <br />~' <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />4 <br />l <br />l <br />l <br />~ <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br />4 <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />~. <br />'....... <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />Figure 20: Data collected by the SOAR Cheyenne II dunng <br />a fllQhl Ol::PMIwIrd and upwmd of Houston. CaIo.;lated <br />backtra.f€ClCreS are represented by !he five yellow lines <br />that terrnnate alcng lhe ~ue leg ollhe flight traclI. The hne <br />colors used in the top gra~ sha.w1g measured CeN <br />concentratlcll at 0.5% reflect !he ~boo along the ft~hl <br />track shown on the map CeN coocentraOOris In'Yl'1(!(bately <br />dowrrwind of Houston 'M!fe observed to be as mud1 as 10 <br />bmes higher than that measured on the east west, and <br />south sides of !he urban plLrne. The cause of the <br />brrodality In concentration IS not kno'-Nn. althoug1 Slrnlar <br />obsefvalions were made dunng lhe TexAQS study in <br />2000 <br /> <br />35 <br />