Laserfiche WebLink
<br />39 <br /> <br />1 that a projection be made as to how far away, or how many <br /> <br />2 counties over this is going to make some possible effect of <br /> <br />3 the weather, and I ~ertainly, being familiar with the hearing -hat <br /> <br />4 we had la,st fall in Alan,osa, and again this one this past <br /> <br />5 spring, know that one or their concerns is that the weather <br /> <br />6 modification operation, of their target area, may even have <br /> <br />7 some effect over the other side of the mountains, so yo" do <br /> <br />8 have to project, it seems to me, and it doesn't have to be <br /> <br />9 an ad infinitl'm, it has some reasonable dimensions, and I <br /> <br />10 think thatls all the Act calls on the applicant to do, is <br /> <br />11 give the Director their best guess of how fa:;: this is going <br /> <br />12 out; but the notice part of the Act ought to coincide with the <br /> <br />13 whole area that might be affected, or reasonably be expected t <br /> <br />14 be affected. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />MR. SO~li\RDS: I was thinking down in our area it <br /> <br />16 wouldn't pertain to anything else, because we're right by one <br /> <br />17 state that allows seeding, and e.nother state doesn"t. If a <br /> <br />18 fall-out drift falls into another state, isnlt Colorado liable <br /> <br />19 for whatever it does? It looks like something would need to <br /> <br />20 be done on that. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />HEARING OFFICER HORAN: I tMnk en that specific <br /> <br />22 point it f S a legal iss,,€, certainly, but the only Act that <br /> <br />23 these r"les and reg"lations have to implement is the Colorado <br /> <br />24 Weather Modification Act. It there was to be any extension of <br /> <br />25 the notice requirement over into New Mexico) OT conversely, <br /> <br />MR5, LORINA M, BROWN <br />CERTIF"IEO SH.ORTHAND REPORTER <br />283 TITAN STREET <br />AIIRORA. COLORADO 80010 <br />