Laserfiche WebLink
<br />176 <br /> <br />from cockpit communications interference which was never com- <br /> <br /> <br />pletely eliminated. No good data in seeded clouds was ob- <br /> <br /> <br />tained. One pass with the particle counter through a piece <br /> <br /> <br />of the Schweizer contrail showed that the aircraft contrail <br /> <br /> <br />contained in the neighborhood of 1010 particles per meter <br /> <br /> <br />of flight path. <br />It is interesting that 1010 particles per meter is also <br />the result calculated by Knollenberg (1972) for a twin- <br />engine jet (NCAR Sabreliner) contrail. The occurrence of <br />similar orders of magnitude for completely different air- <br />craft configurations and power plants suggests that there <br /> <br /> <br />is some mechanism operating in aircraft exhaust wakes that <br /> <br /> <br />results in roughly similar numbers of particles per meter <br /> <br /> <br />of flight path independent of aircraft or engine type. <br /> <br /> <br />The solar cell signal was subject to the constant rolling <br /> <br /> <br />of the smaIl aircraft. At the 10w sun angles experienced <br /> <br /> <br />in wintertime in the Colorado area, small angles of roll <br /> <br /> <br />produced large variations in the cosine of the zenith angle. <br /> <br /> <br />This angle determines the response of the cell to the sun. <br /> <br /> <br />From the few passes under contrails and seeded clouds, the <br /> <br /> <br />best estimate is that a 5% to 20% decrease in solar power <br /> <br />occurred in the cloud shadow. <br /> <br />(The constant rolling produced <br /> <br />a variation of about 20% in the signal.) <br /> <br /> <br />In photographs, visual observations and the time~lapse <br /> <br /> <br />movies, the seeded portions of the aircraft contrail were <br /> <br /> <br />clearly distinguishable from the unseeded portions. See <br />