My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00116
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:27:58 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:13:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Sponsor Name
MWDSC
Project Name
Weather Modification White Paper
Title
Weather Modification for Precipitation Augmentation and Its Potential Usefulness to the Colorado River Basin States
Prepared For
Colorado River 7 Basin States
Prepared By
Tom Ryan - Metro Water District of Southern California
Date
10/1/2005
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Appendix A <br /> <br />Melt and runoff from snowpack contributes most of the reservoir storage in large portions of <br />the Western U.S., so snowpack augmentation is an attractive target in the region. Accordingly, <br />operational cloud seeding to augment snowpack in the mountains has a long history in several <br />western states. Prior studies suggest that seeding of supercooled orographic clouds has worked, <br />yielding seasonal precipitation increases on the order of 10% (AMS, 1998). More research and <br />documentation is needed to buttress these findings, however. <br />Winter orographic seeding has been dominated by the use of silver iodide (AgI), delivered <br />from ground-based generators or aircraft The last federally-assisted cloud seeding project was a <br />winter experiment in Utah during the 1990s (Super 1999). There are a number of other seeding <br />technologies that have been put forward but not tested extensively. New chemical compositions, <br />such as silver chloride-iodide complexes, may act more efficiently to produce ice particles at <br />temperatures warmer than _50C, where AgI is ineffective. Similar warm temperature results may <br />be achieved by cost-effective liquid propane generators (Medina 2000). The Utah WDMP <br />experiment operated such generators. <br />The use of tracer chemicals with the seeding materials affords a method to verify the <br />targeting of those materials. Such chemicals were employed in the Nevada WDMP experiment, <br />which even attempted to distinguish ground-based and aircraft seeding signatures. This <br />experiment also included a Lagrangian particle dispersion model and windflow from the MM5 <br />cloud model to further characterize seeding plume trajectories (Koracln et al. 1998). The <br />Colorado experiment also used a Lagrangian transport model (Uliasz 1994) coupled with the <br />RAMS cloud model (Cotton et al. 1994) to evaluate targeting of seeding material. <br /> <br />2.2 Convective Seeding <br /> <br />Research into warm-season seeding of convective clouds in the Western U.S. was <br />conducted mostly in the late 1960s through early 1980s, notably through projects such as the <br />National Hail Research Experiment (NHRE) and the High Plains Experiment (HIPLEX; Cooper <br />and Lawson 1984). These experiments had mixed results for hail suppression and rainfall <br />augmentation, respectively. Rosenfeld and Woodley (1989; 1993) reported increases in radar- <br />estimated rainfall with Agl seeding in West Texas during the 1980s. Tracer studies were <br />conducted in North Dakota in 1989 (Boe et al. 1992). <br />More recently, positive findings regarding hygroscopic seeding have been reported in <br />several experiments, e.g., in South Africa (Mather et al. 1997), Thailand (Silverman and <br />Sukarnjanaset 2000), Mexico (Bruintjes et al. 2001; Fowler et al. 2001), and India (Murty et al. <br />2000). Vin et al. (2000; 2001) have conducted modeling studies of hygroscopic seeding that offer <br />plausible arguments for why such seeding may lead to rain increases. <br /> <br />2.3 Individual Project Goals <br /> <br />The states conducting WDMP research are shown in Fig. 1. Three projects, in Nevada, <br />Utah and Colorado, are involved in cool-season, orographic seeding. The other two projects, one <br />in North Dakota and the other in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico, seed convective clouds <br />during the warm season. Specifically, individual project principal goals are as follows: <br />. Nevada - (1) Remotely sense supercooled cloud water to quantify cloud seeding <br />potential in a selected watershed; (2) Apply mesoscale atmospheric and dispersion <br />modeling to evaluate seeding effectiveness under a variety of storm conditions; (3) <br />Evaluate seeding effectiveness through physical and chemical analyses of snow <br />packs; (4) Use hydrologic modeling to estimate impacts of seeding-induced increases <br />in snow packs on streamflow; (5) Characterize natural and seeded cloud regions with <br />in situ aircraft microphysical measurements. <br />. Utah - (1) Conduct randomized cloud seeding on the Wasatch Plateau using propane <br />dispensers to develop embryonic ice particles; (2) Explore impacts on precipitation by <br />the cloud seeding. <br />. Colorado - (1) Configure the Colorado State University cloud model (RAMS) and conduct <br />modeling over operational cloud seeding areas; (2) Implement algorithms simulating <br />cloud seeding generators as sources of ice nuclei, (3) Simulate Lagrangian transport <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.