Laserfiche WebLink
<br />56,600 minutes in 1997 despite the fact that the total amount of both the silver iodide and dry ice <br />dispensed in 1998 were 22% and 10% lower, respectively. Despite the increased amount of seeding <br />time, the number of seeding flights and the total flight hours of those flights were fewer in number in <br />1998. There were 598 seeding flights for 1,370 hours flight time in 1998 compared to 651 flights and <br />1,953 seeding flight hours in 1997. These differences turn out to be 8% fewer seeding flights and 30% <br />fewer hours flown in 1998 than in 1997. All other categories of flight similarly decreased, such as <br />observation flights and "other" flights which included maintenance, ferry flights and flights to travel <br />to other airports to standby for possible operations. <br /> <br />In 1997 we noted the program's apparent good fortune to have such few days in which <br />extensive hail damage was common to both the northern and southern target areas on the same day. <br />Since we couldn't adequately explain the unusual pattern, we were curious to see whether the pattern <br />repeated itself this year. Hail-day research was done by our meteorological assistant, Kyle Winright. <br />He found that when damaging hail f~ll in the northern target area, it would also fall in the southern <br />target area about 41% ofthenme. Looking at it another way, 59% of the time no hail would occur <br />in the southern target area. Also, the average number of hail-days common to both areas was 34 days <br />per season. This year there were o!1ly 15 days in which hail was common to both target areas, an <br />exceptional departure from the historic normal, down from 37 days in 1997. We would like to take <br />full credit for this, but we can't. We think there were unusual weather patterns at work this season <br />which helped create this anomaly, although cloud seeding is very likely to have had a major impact as <br />well. In the next section hail distribution will be examined more closely. <br /> <br />Another observation of the historic data examined showed that most of the time the days with <br />hail damage common to both targets were generally not extensively damaging in both areas on the <br />same day, only one of the areas was usually hit hard. To be sure, there were days in which considerable <br />damage to both areas did occur, however, they were the exception, not the general rule. However, <br />more work needs to be done in this department to see whether or not seeding effects may be <br />. . <br />suggested. 1998 turned out to have just two days in which hail damage of some significance occurred <br />common to both areas: May 23rd and May 24th. As a brief aside on hail damage, the northern target <br />area sustained only 45% of the number of hail claims that it had in 1997, and 1997 was one of the <br />lowest years for crop-hail damage in many years in that region. So, NW Kansas appears to have had <br />a super year as far as having less crop-hail damage is concerned. <br /> <br />22 <br />