Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~c....." ti..c "~/.:rtd.:.- f.j ~~r /3...1:..... P.-f.....r r""r""j~ r Cu...;r...I.e,,~,..~ E'oI'Alo.IAf,;,., I("'~/,;.,,-T" <br />~'1 I?,D,6.II;dr,;R.w, 5~..II~..;A.u..Jrt 4 J-F. tlA~,,~I-..;d ~ 197~ <br /> <br />6. SUMMARY DISCUSSION ~~ RECOMMENDATIO,S <br /> <br />The'_ principal conclusions arrrived at 0:':1. the basis' of the overall evaluation <br /> <br />are: <br /> <br />1) There vas no stgnificant difference in the net target area precipitFtlon " <br />. . <br />on s~~ded experimental days ahd that on not-s~eded experioental days. This null <br />effect vas apparently due to the.m1xinR of positive and negative seeding effects. <br />Negative effects occurred vhen seeding ~as conducted du~ing out~f-bounds condi~ <br />tions ~nd positive effects occurred vhen seeding vas conducted during in-bounds <br />.. _ .- conditions. The findings'discussed in it;eI:lS 2 through 8 below are based upon <br />diagnostic analyses (see Chapter. 5) ~f six-hour block precipitation data rather <br /> <br />'than Oft the 24-hour experimental day data. "~is permitted the sorting out of <br />the various effects of seeding. <br />2) During the 147 experimental days, stable orographic clouds prevailed. <br />about 52% of the time and- accounted for about 33% of the experimental day pre-' <br />cipitation (at K03) covered by the diagnostic analysis. This stable orographic <br />cloud category includes eases witb shallow unstable layers no thicker than 75 mb. <br />Excluding the stable ones, cases' ~ange mostly from neutrally stable stratiform <br />clouds to ones containing embedded shallow cumuli or stratocumulus. During 37% <br />of the t1me!..!~~ about 10% of the diagnostic analysis experimental day precipita- <br />tion, warm l~!} stable clouds occurred. \~en these were seeded, substantial pre- <br />cipitation increases occurred in the target area and art the downwind flank. <br />During .15% of the time, or about 23% of the experimental day precipitation, <br />stable orographic clouds vhose tops ~ere colder than -29C occurred. Uhen these <br />were seeded, decre~ses in precipitation occurred. The decreases were marked <br />.'. when the cloud level_wind component nor~~l to the barrier was strong and the <br /> <br />I <br />.~' <br />.1 <br />ji <br />r <br /> <br />cloud deep~ If the uind component nornl<nl to the barrier ""'as ueak and tbe_ cloud <br />shallow, then increases occurred in the cold top category. This latter effect <br />had not been anticipated from earlier cloud seeding tests. <br />)) During approximately 48Z of the rloe. and accounting for about 67% of <br />the experimental day precipitation, the air mass had sufficient thermodynamic <br />instability to be considered outside of the srable orographic category, i.e.. <br />deep convection uas present. Seeding und~r these conditions may have resulted <br />in an increase in precipitation on do~nwind slopes. particularly when the normal <br />vind component \Ins low. It probabl)' resultcc! in decreases on the upvind slopes. <br /> <br />to-I <br /> <br />-21- <br /> <br />A-1l-5 <br /> <br />.: ~ ..'.; .~.. <br /> <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />i <br />1 <br />i. <br />f <br />~' ~. <br /> <br />! <br />l.' <br />~;. <br /> <br />~ <br />