My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00071
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:27:42 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:12:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Western Weather Consultants
Project Name
Vail Pass
Date
11/1/1984
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~i._r :-.;rt <br /> <br />FHD10Lt):-;IC;.L L:,':':f!...O."~E~;I (ir HI:~_bAC:::u;S f'IJ\-.t..;j':-; i.. ;.;.:::..;..:IO~ TO S~O'''''XEi.:! DAT&-l/ <br /> <br />',. <br />"_. ',).;l'~' <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />In an atte~pt to det~rmine th~ eff~ct of an in~rca~eJ <br />-sn~pack on the develor~ent ct CCrt21r. her~ac~o~s <br />plant species, six sites ~erc chosen, one each on <br />north and south aspects at three clevat1ons. LYUG m. <br />3140 ro, and )~/U m. lwenty-t1ve speC1€S of plants <br />were observed for the van.cus phE:.nOphaSes ""1.th 1) spec- <br />imens of each spec1es measured at each site. Over a <br />per10d at tour grow~ng seasons, aODut )U,UOG observa- <br />cions were recorded. The'follo~ing charactE:.ristiCS <br />were observed: leaf growth, shoot growth. inflores- <br />cence height, total plant height, inflorescence devel- <br />opment by percentage of flowers In bud. open. or in <br />various Gtates of fruit development and se~d dispersal. <br />Correlation coefficients were determined between the <br />year day of various phenophases and year day of 100 <br />percent snow di'~ppearance in the plots. An analysis <br />of var!ance was done betwe~n'ihurber fescue (Festuca <br />thurberi Vasey) y~ar day of maximum growth and year <br />day of snow disappearance in 1971. 1972. and 197). <br />The data produced the following generalizations: <br /> <br />1. In general for every 10 percent increase in snow <br />above the lon~ term average, the earlier pheno- <br />'phases are delayed up to ~ days, depending on <br />otner varlaoles sucn as a1r temperature. IhiS <br />delay is not linear tor all phenophases ot a <br />species. Lenerally. the earlier phenopnases <br />are delayed more than the later phenophases, <br />for a given sp~cies. <br /> <br />2. Plants of the same species on south aspects <br />reached maximum growth. tlower11.t0. trultln~. and <br />maturity up to ~ weeks ahead of ~~]nts occurring <br />on equivale~t nOTLh aspects. <br /> <br />3. Plants of the same species at hi&~ler elevations <br />on equivalent aspects reached vegetat1ve and re- <br />productive ~turity up to 6 weeKS later than <br />plants at lower elevat1ons. <br /> <br />4. The north aspect and higher elevation plants <br />matured. tlowered. and tru1ted at a smaller size <br />than the same species on south aspects ~nd at <br />lower elevations. <br /> <br />5. There was greatest correlation between the various <br />phenophases and sno~ free date in the excessive <br />snow year and on south aspects. <br /> <br />6. The late blooming species' phenophas~s (probably <br />long day plants) were least 1ntluenced by sno~' <br />depth. <br /> <br />7. Certsin plant species showed an ability to "catch- <br />up" in theft development despHe a late ~ti:.i:-Tti--. <br />the spnng. <br /> <br />8. The difference in dates of phenophases between <br />norch and south aspects decreased as tne altirude <br />increased. <br /> <br />The data support <br />~ill result in a <br />and maturation. <br />i:lOoth . <br /> <br />the thesis that an increase in snov <br />delay io1herbaceous plant ~evelopoer.t <br />This delay could be as long as 1 <br /> <br />See +w, '.5 <br /> <br />DM,.ffed <br />. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />An increase in snow fall in the. forest ecosystem will <br />cause the snOw tree date to occur later 1n the spr1ng. <br />In turn, initiation of growth of herbaceous plants <br />,will be later which will "set back" "most. it not all. <br />phenophases. This ""ill cause "spring" to come later <br />'ln the year on the average. As far as affecting the <br />,herbaceous plant populations. an increase 1n snow fall <br />lis unlikely to have any direct effee~. The eene Dools <br />[Of these plants allow a high variation 1n date of <br />Igrowth inltiatio~~:nd still obtain maturation before <br />I the end af the g-r~~-ins. season. The study needs to be <br />carried on for seve~al more years for a ~ore <br />definitive conclusion. <br /> <br />l/tn ~ceinhoff. H.W., and J~D. Ives (Eds). 19i(.. Ecol~gical impacts of sno~~ack augroentation in th~ 5an Jua~ <br />~ountain~, Colorado. San JUMn Ecolo~Y Pro:~(t. Fin~l Report. Colorado State Univ. Pobl.. Fot~ Colli~$. <br />l..!present address: Dept. of Bin] og:.-. Fct"t Lc.'.:i s ;" lj q;e. Durango. Colorado. 81301. <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />323 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.