My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00002
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:27:13 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:10:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
Western Weather Consultants
Project Name
San Juan
Date
11/1/1984
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,I <br /> <br />[COLOefCAl r~AGT1> OJ_ ~~._'::';~T!~c~: AUG}'(E,\"TATIQr{ IN THE SA.~ Jt;AN MOrn;TAINS OF COWkADQ <br />CHAPTER I I~rrRoDucrION <br /> <br />1.:' IVes. J. "" S".eeney. H.~. Steinhoff, and W. Y. Hovel1 <br /> <br />This document 1s the final report of the San Juan <br />Ecology Project (SJEP) ....hich hils been supported by the <br />United States Bureau of Reclamation under Contract <br />No. 14-06-0-7052 from 1970 to 1975. An earlier study. <br />that ~as prepared as a problem analysis, has been re- <br />ported previously (SJEP, Phase I Final Report: Teller <br />et al. 1970). Th~ present report (Phase II) does not <br />include any of the early, preparatory material. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />This Summar condenses the evaluation of ecologic <br />impacts due to varying snowpac in the San uan oun-- <br />tains. It is basea on a study of the influence of a <br />snowfall which is quite variable in both space and <br />time. reet observation of the effects of snowpack <br />au~ntation were not possible during t e -year e <br />of the San Juan Ecology Project. but the relationships <br />established between ecosystem components and snow <br />conditions allow the estimation of possible effects of <br />long-term successtul cloud seeding. <br /> <br />The statements which follow treat the main ecosyStem <br />components in order. The impact of snowpack augmen- <br />tation on each ecosystem compOnent is arranged accord- <br />ing to the nature of the environmental change which <br />produced the effect. The basic environmental changes <br />are th~ addition of more snow and more silver. Such <br />changes could initiate a chain" of effects that would <br />radiate throughout the ecosystem. The first links in <br />the chain which have a significant impact on ecosystem <br />components are: (1) lower soil temperature in the <br />spring. (2) more moisture in the spring, (3) de~per <br />snowpack, and (4) more silver. <br /> <br />This summary includes only statements verifiable from <br />the data. with causal connections and conclusions <br />that would be accepted by scientific peers in environ- <br />f mental disciplines. Speculation about causal links in <br />the chain, or extension of implications beyond effects <br />which were studied in the chain, and where the extension <br />involves application of general ecologic understanding, <br />are avoided in this summary. Such appropriate scien- <br />tific conjecture can be tound in Chapters II and III <br />and in segments of individual reports that are spec- <br />ulative by implication through the use of terms such <br />as "may be" or"probably". or which are labelled as <br />"broad significance" or "implications." <br /> <br />Many other findings, which ar~ not directly related to <br />the effects of soawpack augmentation 00 the indicated <br />ecosystem components are a natural part of such studies. <br />For a summary of these findings reference is made to <br />the abstracts of individual reports or to the details <br />of the individual reports themselves in Chapter IV. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />,.Only two envirOillllentaJ change:; ".,'hich might be induced <br />by increased sno~fall hnve been found to relate signif- <br />icantly to plants in tht:: San JU:ln MOuntains; lower <br />soil temperatures and m(lre soil moisture. <br /> <br />- Lower Soil Temperatures <br /> <br />initiation of shoot e]on!-!lltion ....as delayed for plants <br />otn in tn(! tundra and forests 8S a :-esult ot lo","Cr <br />. soil temperatures asso<'iCitEd ..dt 1 a eeper sn01.'Pac' for <br />the species studied. These includeQ Englemann spruce <br />1 ~ engelrnannJ.J.j, qu.':Iki.ng aspen (Po~ulus trem~loides), <br />Thurber fescue (T:::.estU(;3 thurhf':.!}), and numerous <br /> <br />herbaceous species in both the tundra and forest cea- <br />do1.7s. e delay was most apparent in species 1.7i th <br />~rowth points In t e mme ate zone 0 ower <br />temperatures at the ground level. This includes pri- <br />marily the herbaceous species. The gro~th regions of <br />trees, in the cambium snd terminal buds, were affected <br />more indirectly, possibly through soil temperature <br />effects on root function. From this a less clear re- <br />lationship between growth inception and sno~ack vas <br />anticipated although there was a general correlation <br />of bud burst dates for both spruce and aspen with the <br />snow clear dates. Moisture stress in spruce was un- <br />usually hi~h durin~ the neried of snowmelt and decreased <br />dramatically at about the snow clear date. This did <br />not affect the annual total radial growth of spruce. <br />which initiated 2 to 4 weeks earlier than bud burst. <br />apparently independent of snowpack. Resultant annual <br />biomass ~rowth of spruce was remarkably constant from <br />year to year, unrelated to snowfall. Aspen was more <br />variable in annual bioll3ass production. Aspen growth <br />inception was delayed by 8 later snow clear d~te, bu~ <br />we did not determine whether or not this was directly <br />linked to variations in biomass production. <br /> <br />The delay in beainnidg of growth persisted throURh <br />the other stages of the life cycle of most plants, <br />but with less magnitude. There seemed universally a <br />compensation tactor which permitted every species <br />to complete l~s annual cycle of development each <br />summer. regardless ot snowpack depth. LXcept tor <br />spruce, there was no S1mi~ar compensatory mechanism <br />for biomass production. In most herbaceous species <br />of the tundra, biomass production vas inversely <br />related to depth of snowpack. <br /> <br />No ~ffect was found on either 1nitiation of development <br />or biomass production of oak (Quercus ~ambel111). pre- <br />sumably because even in a deep snow year the snow had <br />always disappeared from oak plots before the earliest <br />date of growth initiation. <br /> <br />- More Moisture <br /> <br />Phytosociological studies.in both forests and tundra <br />showed that plant communities were arranged along <br />snow clear date gradients. In the forests oak gives <br />way to aspen. then to subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), <br />and finally to Englemsnn spruce as the snow clear date <br />extends later into the year. The change was less <br />obvious in the drier communities, i.e. in oak. The <br />tundra changed from xeric (drier) to more mesic or <br />even hydric communities. This could be expected to <br />result in an increase in frequency of the rarer species. <br /> <br />A dendrochronologic survey of ponderos8 pine {Pinus <br />ponderosa) immediately outside the target area showed <br />its growth on dry sites to be associated with December <br />precipitation. The relationship is a direct one and <br />pine would presumably show an increase in gro~th if <br />cloud seeding were to add to mid-winter snowfall. ~o <br />such relationship was found for Engelmann spruce, the <br />only other species on which dendrochronologic ~ork <br />has been conducted in this study. <br /> <br />Animals <br /> <br />Only the lower soil temperature and greater sno\ol depth, <br />which mi~ht be expected to follow an ~ncrease 1n sno~- <br />fall. have been found influential on animal activity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.