My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP00153
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP00153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:25:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:09:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Indian Water Rights
State
CO
Date
3/19/1987
Author
Duane Woodard
Title
Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights-Final Settlement Agreement-December 10 1986-Statement of Duane Woodard at the Southwestern Water Conservation District Fifth Annual Water Seminar
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />0.1.79 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />LINE REPAYMENT FROM CRSP POWER REVENUES WOULD BE REQUIRED. SEVERAL <br /> <br />OF YOU FLEW TO DURANGO THE NIGHT OF JUNE 26 TO HAVE MEETINGS WITH <br /> <br />YOUR BOARDS. YOU RETURNED THE MORNING OF THE 27TH PREPARED TO <br /> <br />/ SACRIFICE STILL MORE. YOU OFFERED TO SCALE DOWN THE PROJECT BY <br /> <br />DELETING LANDS PROPOSED FOR IRRIGATION THROUGH THE DRY SIDE CANAL. <br /> <br />IN THE LAST TWO DAY~THE DEADLOCK OVER THE NON-INTERCOURSE <br /> <br />ACT BROKE. <br /> <br />NEW MEXICO AGREED TO REMAIN NEUTRAL ON THE ISSUE OF <br /> <br />THE NON-INTERCOURSE ACT IT ALSO . AGREED TO SPONSOR LEGISLATION <br /> <br />REMOVING THOSE RESTRICTIONS:FROM THE, TRIBE. <br /> <br />THESE EFFORTS CULMINATED "IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF OMB AND <br /> <br />INTERIOR OF OUR COST SHARE AGREEMENT. THIS ACCEPTANCE WAS CON- <br /> <br />TINGENT UPON A FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE TRIBES' RESERVED RIGHTS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CLAIMS. THIS WAS EXPECTED TO OCCUR BY JULY 30TH, AS ALL THAT RE-, <br /> <br />MAINED WAS CLARIFICATION OF THE MARCH 14TH AGREEMENT. <br /> <br />CHAMPAGNE FLOWED, BUT THE CELEBRATION WAS SHORT LIVED. <br />GRAPPLING WITH THE TRIBES' NEW REQUEST FOR A RESERVED RIGHT DEMANDED <br />INCREASED SCRUTINY AND INVOLVEMENT. THE DOLORES WATER CONSERVANCY <br /> <br />DISTRICT HIRED AN ATTORNEY TO ADVISE THEM. INTENSE EFFORT DEFINING <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />THE TERMS, INSURING THAT OTHER WATER USERS WOULD NOT BE ADVERSELY <br /> <br />IMPACTED, PROTECTING WATER USERS SHOULD THE PROJECT NOT BE BUILT <br />OR THE PROJECT FAIL REMAINED. AN ISSUE AROSE OVER THE TRANSFER <br /> <br />OF 100 ACRES TO THE TRIBES. INCREASED PRESSURE ON THE NON-FEDERAL <br /> <br />COALITION GREW AS DID LOCAL AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPPOSITION. <br /> <br />THE SPLIT IN INTERIOR REMAINED WITH ROSS SWIMMER AND RALPH TARR <br /> <br />OPPOSING THE PROJECT. MEETINGS TO "CLARIFY AND REFINE" THE MARCH <br /> <br />. 14 AGREEMENT NEVER MATERIALIZED, INSTEAD INTENSE "RENEGOTIATIONS" <br />OF EVERY ASPECT OF THE DEAL BEGAN. LEASING REMAINED THE CENTRAL <br /> <br />:':SSI1E )'IUT WAS NOT THE ONLY ISSUE. DEFINITION OF PROJECT RESERVED <br /> <br />-<:- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.