My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP00153
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP00153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:25:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:09:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Indian Water Rights
State
CO
Date
3/19/1987
Author
Duane Woodard
Title
Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights-Final Settlement Agreement-December 10 1986-Statement of Duane Woodard at the Southwestern Water Conservation District Fifth Annual Water Seminar
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />-.1.---. ______._~_. .---- ----.------- <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br />. ' <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0182 <br /> <br />THE INTERIOR WANTED ANOTHER $40 MILLION FROM COLORADO FOR THE <br />TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT FUND, DEMANDED MORE UP FRONT MONEY, AND REFUSED <br />TO QUANTIFY THE EQUITABLE OBLIGATIONS AND FEDERAL TRUST RESPONSI- <br /> <br />; <br />BILITIESe KNOWING THAT WE COULD NEVER MEET THE FEDERAL DEMAND"S IN <br /> <br />EARLY NOVEMBER, WE DISMISSED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM THE NEGO- <br />TIATION TABLE.THIS WAS RISKY, YET WE HAD NO ALTERNATIVE. WE KNEW <br />THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF OMB AND THE DEPART- <br /> <br />MENT OF THE INTERIOR. WE FURTHER KNEW THAT THE NON-FEDERAL .LOCAL <br /> <br />RESIDENTS OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO AND NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO, BOTH <br /> <br />INDIANS AND NON-INDIANS, HAD TO REACH AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEMSELVES <br />IN THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICALLY OVERRIDE INTERIOR AND OMB. <br /> <br />EVEN WITHOUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ISSUES AROSE WHICH <br />THREATENED OUR FRAGILE COALITION. PRIMARY AMONG THESE ISSUES WAS <br /> <br />THE OFF-RESERVATION USE OF TRIBAL WATERS. THE OPPORTUNITY TO LEASE <br /> <br />WATER OFF-RESERVATION WAS CENTRAL TO THE TRIBES' DEMANDS. COLORADO <br /> <br />AGREED TO THE CONCEPT EARLY ON AS LONG AS WE PROTECTED STATE LAW AND THE <br /> <br />LAW OF THE RIVER. HOWEVER AT TH~ SEPTEMBER MEETING THE NEW MEXICO <br />INTERSTATE STREAM COMMISSIONER STATED THAT IF THE ANIMAS-LA PLAT~ <br />. <br /> <br />PROJECT PUT WATER IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE, HE COULD WITHDRAW HIS <br /> <br />SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT. <br /> <br />BALANCING THESE 'COMPETi-NG INTERESTS WAS NOT AN EASY TASK <br />AND FOR A LONG TIME 'WE ,DID NOT KNOW. IF IT COULD BE DONE. INDIAN <br />, <br /> <br />AND NON-INDIAN NEIGHBORS RECOGNIZED THE PRACTICAL AND POLITICAL <br />LIMITATIONS INHERENT~ IN THE SETTLEMENT AND ACCEPTED THE FACT THAT <br />NOT EVERYTHING WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED NOR ALL GOALS MET IN THE <br />SETTLEMENT. WE-ALWAYS BELIEVED, THAT THE LOCAL WATER USERS COULD <br />REACH A COMPROMISE. <br /> <br />-3': <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.