Laserfiche WebLink
<br />b <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />2. The Dangers <br /> <br />Clearly, the current pragmatic and realistic water policy environment in <br />Washington is perishable. As the Jimmy Carter era taught us, it could last <br />just four years. These are mercurial times, in which world politics and <br />economic upheaval could wipe out that pragmatic and realistic water policy <br />environment in the next election. We must pursue a number of water-related <br />goals now, even if our ability to pay for the achievement of those goals <br />is still being developed. <br /> <br />Furthermore, some of our water entitlements under interstate compact are <br />endangered. As The Denver Post pointed out in an editorial on February 20: <br /> <br />This winter's drought is a timely reminder that unless Coloradans <br />take action soon to nail down their water rights on the Colorado <br />River, this state could face great turmoil by the mid-1980's. <br /> <br />Events now unfolding in Arizona and California, as well as in <br />Colorado, could trigger the upheaval. They are: <br /> <br />2~'~ <br /> <br />. Southern California's difficulty in completing a canal from <br />water-rich northern California mountains to the arid south. <br />Northern opponents have forced a statewide referendum to be held <br />in 1982 to determine whether their water should be shared. The <br />canal is far from certain. <br /> <br />. Completion of the Central Arizona Project in 1986. When this <br />giant diversion system begins pouring Colorado River water into <br />the thirsty valleys around Phoenix and Tucson, a new chapter in <br />the river's history will begin. Arizona will divert much water <br />now being used - as surplus - by Southern California. <br /> <br />If by 1986 Southern California has not resolved its claims in <br />the north, Arizona's withdrawal will arouse cries of anguish from <br />12 million Southern Californians. Those cries will echo as far <br />north as Colorado. <br /> <br />Colorado, whose snowfields feed the river, has a solid claim to <br />a theoretical one-fourth of the water. We could make a strong <br />stand in court. But that old maxim of water law, 'use it or lose <br />it,' looms over the claim. In an average year, about 700,000 <br />acre-feet to which we are entitled, flows unused out of this <br />state in the Colorado River each year . .. Soon we will need <br />that water ourselves. We must make sure it isn't taken from us <br />in the irtterim. <br /> <br />If we don't use the water, Arizona and California will be delighted <br />to grab it. <br /> <br />Another impending threat to Colorado's water entitlements is a treaty between <br />the United States and Mexico, under which the U.S. agreed to deliver 1.5 <br />million acre-feet armually of Colorado River water to Mexican agriculture. <br />