My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP00057
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP00057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:26:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:01:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Indian Water Rights
State
CO
Date
12/4/1990
Author
Daries C Lile
Title
Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights-Final Settlement Agreement-December 10 1986-Colorado Ute Indian Settlement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />the proper forum in which to adjudicate the claims was in the state Court as <br />required by the congressional enactment of the Me Carren lImendment. The Tribe <br />then refiled its claim in the Division 7 Water Court in 1976, This set the <br />stage for the adjudication of the claims or their resolution through <br />negotiation. <br />The basic problem to Southwestern Colorado was not only the 1868 water <br />rights priority date, but the connnunity conflict which could develop when the <br />Indians were given, and put to use, their senior water. Indians and <br />non-Indians live side by side, and their children attend the same schools. <br />Tribal activities are very much a part of the cultura1 heritage of a1l of <br />Southwestern Colorado. The economy of most conununities is affected by the <br />Indians, A long protracted legal battle would severely strain the connnunity <br />relationships. <br />The water rights issue was influenced by a long history of inequities that <br />began with the signing of the 1868 Treaty, the Homestead Act, water projects <br />being built without supplies for the Indians, lack of potable water for Indian <br />connnunities, and a genera1 feeling by the Tribes of a breach of trust by the <br />federa1 government. <br />The scope of the tribal claims revolved around the potentia1 irrigation of <br />93,000 acres of tribal lands. Unfortunately, the tribal lands most suited for <br />irrigation were on the streams with, the least amount of water, primarily the <br />La Plata and Mancos Rivers, If the Indians were successful in obtaining their <br />claims, irrigation on those streams by non-Indians would be totally <br />eliminated. other streams such as the Florida River would a1so be severely <br />impacted, but not to the extent of the Mancos and La Plata Rivers. <br />The resolution of the problem was similar to the solution that occurred in <br />the 1930' s on the Pine River, It was apparent that there was a need to <br />construct storage projects and to transport water from one sub-basin to 03aa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.