Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SAN JUAN/DOLORES BASIN <br /> <br />May-05 <br /> <br />Basinwide Conditions Assessment <br />The SWSI value of 1.5 indicates that for April the <br />basin water supplies were above normal. The Natural <br />Resources Conservation Service reports that May 1 <br />snowpack is 135% of normal. Flow at the gaging station <br />Animas River near Durango was 1,620 cfs, as compared to <br />the long-term average of 771 cfs. Storage in McPhee, <br />Vallecito, and Lemon reservoirs totaled 102% of normal as <br />of the end of April. <br />The SWSI number indicates a lower water supply <br />than actually exists because major reservoirs were dropped <br />to make room for upcoming runoff. <br />With precipitation at 127% of normal in Durango <br />during April soil moisture continued higher throughout the <br />basin. <br />The water supply held up in terms of snow water <br />accumulation during April in southwestern Colorado. An <br />extended warm spell melted much of the south facing slopes <br />at levels up to and above 11,000 feet for a time causing the <br />snow pack to drop off considerably, but storms at the end of <br />the month raised snow water ievels back to 135% across the <br />San Juan-Doiores and San Juan Miguel River Basins. Snow <br />density was near 45% water on the La Platas at the end of <br />April. Extraordinary accumulations of snow water were seen <br />in the La Platas, the Florida River, Los Pinos River and the <br />San Juan River drainages. More storms early in May were <br />keeping the content high. especially compared to the <br />declining average and percentages of normal reached 160% <br />or higher. <br />A significant rise in the rivers developed with the <br />Animas at Durango reaching 2,880 cfs for an average flow. <br />May 24'h the Dolores at Dolores reached 2,440 cfs and the <br />San Juan in Pagosa Springs was running at bank full but not <br />reporting due to removal of the control area as well as <br />damage to recording equipment. All the reporting streams <br />ran well above 150% of normal for April. <br /> <br />Outlook <br />While levels in major reservoirs were lowered in <br />anticipation of the runoff, most of the other reservoirs in the <br />area remained full or topped out during the month. Concern <br />about flooding remains high; however, with most reservoirs <br />being off.channel and others being reduced, it is expected <br />that the seasonal cooling and heating will moderate the <br />runoff. Still, very high flows up to levels seen in past flood <br />years may occur this year. <br /> <br />Public Use ImDacts <br />A good water supply was still welcome in the area <br />and river users as well as recreationists are looking forward <br />to a good season of water supply. <br /> <br />~"- <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />~ <br />> 0 <br />~ <br />a <br />z <br />- ., <br />> <br />~ <br />a., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />Jn96.Ja-'l-97..m93.ffi.6gJEn..OOJa1..01Ja-1.(lZJm.03~J:n.OO <br /> <br />"""'"... <br /> <br />PNM\S R\offi. fIR ~ A..ON"Er( 1/A.1ER YEAR <br /> <br />1.OXl,cm <br /> <br /> v --- <br /> / <br /> / <br /> / <br /> 1/ V --- <br /> / <br /> ~ V <br /> ;:.--; / <br />...-c l:- V --- <br /> <br />t) lDJ,cm <br />~ <br />~ <br />;. <br />'I <br />~ OOJ,cm <br />o <br />~ <br />~ <br />w <br />> 4OO,cm <br />~ <br />::> <br />" <br />a :ro,cm <br /> <br />o <br />Q:l "" ce::..m Fro"""'''''' M>j..oreJ./y "" """ <br /> <br />-El-V\ET(197J) <br /> <br />.....""'(:m2) <br /> <br />___ AVG <br /> <br />-X-aD5 <br /> <br />REPRESENTATIVE RESERVOIRS <br /> <br />300.000 <br /> <br /> <br />250,000 <br /> <br />li <br />~ 200.000 <br />. <br />f150.{XX) <br />1;; <br />~ 100,000 <br /> <br />50.000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />""""" <br /> <br />Valledto <br /> <br />""'''' <br /> <br />8A'oV. !l<II3) Contents <br /> <br />1'204I30I05 Contents <br /> <br />9 <br />