My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WATFSummaryFeb2003
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
Backfile
>
WATFSummaryFeb2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2023 4:55:39 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:27:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
Task Force Meeting Minutes
Date
2/19/2003
Description
Minutes
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
WATF Meeting Summary
Document Relationships
WATFAgendaFeb2003
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Basin <br />The SWSI values (-1.8) indicate that January basin water supplies were below normal, <br />although the SWSI may be overstating the actual conditions in this Basin. February 1, <br />2003 snowpack levels were 82% of average. Storage in Green Mountain, Ruedi, and <br />Williams Fork reservoirs totaled 43% of average at the end of January. <br /> <br />YamDalWhite Basin <br />The SWSI values (-2.1) indicate that the January basin water supplies were below <br />average, although the SWSI may be overstating the actual conditions in this Basin. <br />February 1, 2003 snowpack levels were 80% of average. At the end of January the snow <br />pack was 76% of average for the North Platte River Basin; 80% of average for the <br />Yampa River Basin; 72% of average for the White River Basin; and, 76% of average for <br />the Little Snake River. All were down considerably from the previous month, except for <br />the Little Snake, which was about the same. <br /> <br />San JuanlDolores Basin <br />The SWSI values (-2.3) indicate that January water basin supplies were below normal. <br />February 1, 2003 snowpack levels were 63% of normal. Storage in McPhee, Vallecito, <br />and Lemon reservoirs totaled 57% of normal. <br /> <br />Roger Pielke. State Climatologist <br />Mr. Pielke explained that the drought in the United States is still one ofthe major <br />droughts worldwide and compared the U.S. drought to the droughts in Australia and <br />South Mrica. Colorado is the eighth driest state for precipitation. Statewide we are still <br />in a drought. He said the message is clear, with only a few exceptions, by the <br />representation of climate stations in different water divisions showing our precipitation <br />levels are on the low side of average. January temperatures were above average, and <br />January also was particularly bad for much of the state with below average precipitation. <br />During the water year (October 2002 to January 2003), generally we were below average <br />statewide with few exceptions. We are in a four-year, multi year drought condition. <br />Bottom line is we need to take a precarious position in terms of water supply. The short- <br />term precipitation could eliminate some problems but not for municipalities and <br />irrigation. Fanners will still have dry soil problems. We will not have the same amount <br />of runoff because ofthe very dry soils and greater demand for vegetation. Mr. Pielke said <br />the prudent thing is for us to plan for continued drought. This year is not as bad as last <br />year, but we started with worse conditions. <br /> <br />Bob Glancv. National Weather Service. Short Term Weather Forecast <br />Mr. Glancy said that he was cautiously optimistic about expected precipitation for March. <br />He said that the storm systems were gaining more energy and that would continue <br />through March. Today (February 19,2003) it is snowing in S.E. Colorado, but the next <br />big storm will miss us to the south. He expects the mountains to continue to pick up light <br />snow throughout the weekend. Mr. Glancy felt that snow conditions on March 1, 2003 <br />might look better than they did on February 1 st, due to more expected storms moving into <br />the area, but that we still had a long way to go to recover. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.