My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00133
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:18 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:22:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1990
Title
Western Water Transfers: Public Interest Impacts
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
Larry Morandi
Description
Examination of the public interest impacts of western water transfers
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(4) the cities incorporated the purchased land into their service areas, <br />assuring an adequate water supply for the areas of origin.49 <br /> <br />Eighteen completed or pending water farm purchases in Arizona have been <br />identified through May 1990. Most of them are in La paz County (where over one-half the <br />county's land has been purchased as water farms). Researchers at the University of <br />Arizona note that the "typical transaction is a $15 million purchase of land providing 15,000 <br />acre-feet per year, based on a 100-year pumping regime for groundwater.50 Because of the <br />need for a conveyance faility to transfer water, most of the acquisitions have been near the <br />Central Arizona Project (CAP) aqueduct (which the purchasors assume will be available to <br />wheel their water). The geographic location of the CAP faciltiy "has had the additional <br />effect of concentrating any adverse effects associated with water farms in one part of the <br />state.,,51 <br /> <br />The parties seeking water transfers have spent over $300 million to aquire 500,000 <br /> <br /> <br />acres of rural land for their water rights (nearly 500,000 acre~feet per year). The acreage <br /> <br /> <br />has included irrigated farmland that eventually will be retired, and desert land overlying <br /> <br /> <br />untapped aquifers. The transfers have been of land title only; no water has yet been <br /> <br /> <br />moved.52 The impacts on rural areas have been fiscal to date--tax and revenue losses <br /> <br /> <br />(there have been no environmental effects as in Colorado's Arkansas River Valley). <br /> <br />Despite the absence of actual water transfers, there have been fiscal repercussions <br />from the land sales. The Arizona Constitution exempts municipally owned land from <br />county taxation; La Paz County, therefore, is precluded from continuing to tax formerly <br />irrigated land purchased by the city of Phoenix. The county's tax base decreases, which <br />affects its ability to issue bonds backed by general fund revenue. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.